CassiopeiaA (CasA; listenⓘ) is a supernova remnant (SNR) in the constellation Cassiopeia and the brightest extrasolar radio source in the sky at frequencies below 1GHz. The supernova occurred approximately 11,000 light-years (3.4kpc) away within the Milky Way; given the width of the Orion Arm, it lies in the next-nearest arm outwards, the Perseus Arm, about 30 degrees from the Galactic anticenter. The expanding cloud of material left over from the supernova now appears approximately 10 light-years (3pc) across from Earth's perspective. It has been seen in wavelengths of visible light with amateur telescopes down to 234mm (9.25in) with filters.
It is estimated that light from the supernova itself first reached Earth near the 1660s (±30 years), although there are no definitively corresponding records from then. CasA is circumpolar at and above mid-Northern latitudes which had extensive records and basic telescopes. Its likely omission in records is probably due to interstellar dust absorbing optical wavelength radiation before it reached Earth, although it is possible that it was recorded as a sixth magnitude star 3 Cassiopeiae by John Flamsteed in 1680. Possible explanations lean toward the idea that the source star was unusually massive and had previously ejected much of its outer layers. These outer layers would have cloaked the star and absorbed much of the visible-light emission as the inner star collapsed.
CasA was among the first discrete astronomical radio sources found. Its discovery was reported in 1948 by Martin Ryle and Francis Graham-Smith, astronomers at Cambridge, based on observations with the Long Michelson Interferometer. The optical component was first identified in 1950.
Possible observations
Calculations working back from the currently observed expansion point to an explosion that would have become visible on Earth around 1667. Astronomer William Ashworth and others have suggested that the Astronomer RoyalJohn Flamsteed inadvertently observed the supernova on 16 August[O.S. 6 August]1680, when he catalogued a sixth-magnitude star 3 Cassiopeiae, but there is no corresponding star at the recorded position. It is estimated that the supernova should have reached a magnitude of 3.2 at its maximum and decayed to the 6th magnitude (as observed by Flamsteed) in 2 months after that. Possible alternative explanations include an error in the position, or that a transient was recorded. Caroline Herschel noted that a star in the vicinity of τ Cas, HD 220562, fitted well with 3 Cas if a common error in sextant readings was made. Alternatively, the star AR Cassiopeiae could have been observed, again with the position recorded incorrectly. The position and timing mean that it possibly was an observation of the Cassiopeia A progenitor supernova.
Another suggestion from recent cross-disciplinary research is that the supernova was the "noon day star", observed in 1630, that was thought to have heralded the birth of CharlesII, the future monarch of Great Britain. However, it is more probable that the "noon day star" was the planet Venus that reached its maximum morning brightness two days earlier, allowing day time visibility in a clear sky. A bright supernova in Cassiopeia would have been visible for months and there would be more observation records as Cassiopeia is visible above the horizon any night in Europe.
No supernova occurring within the Milky Way has been visible to the naked eye from Earth since Kepler's Supernova of 1604, even with telescopes. The possible observation of the supernova resulting in the Cassiopeia A remnant would make the only exception. First light from the supernova remnant G1.9+0.3 reached Earth more recently than the first light from Cassiopeia A, but the associated supernova was not observed.
Expansion
The expansion shell has a temperature of around 30million K, and is expanding at 4,000−6,000km/s.
Observations of the exploded star through the Hubble Space Telescope have shown that, despite the original belief that the remnants were expanding in a uniform manner, there are high velocity outlying eject knots moving with transverse velocities of 5,500−14,500km/s with the highest speeds occurring in two nearly opposing jets. When the view of the expanding star uses colors to differentiate materials of different chemical compositions, it shows that similar materials often remain gathered together in the remnants of the explosion.
Radio source
CasA had a flux density of 2720 ± 50 Jy at 1GHz in 1980. Because the supernova remnant is cooling, its flux density is decreasing. At 1GHz, its flux density is decreasing at a rate of 0.97 ± 0.04 percent per year. This decrease means that, at frequencies below 1GHz, CasA is now less intense than CygnusA. CasA is still the brightest extrasolar radio source in the sky at frequencies above 1GHz.
X-ray source
Although CasX-1 (or CasXR-1), the apparent first X-ray source in the constellationCassiopeia was not detected during the 16June 1964, Aerobeesounding rocket flight, it was considered as a possible source. CasA was scanned during another Aerobee rocket flight of 1October 1964, but no significant X-ray flux above background was associated with the position. Cas XR-1 was discovered by an Aerobee rocket flight on 25April 1965, at RA23h 21mDec+58°30′. CasX-1 is CasA, a TypeIISNR at RA23h 18mDec+58°30′.
The designations CassiopeiaX-1, CasXR-1, CasX-1 are no longer used, but the X-ray source is CasA (SNR G111.7-02.1) at 2U2321+58.
In 2005 an infrared echo of the Cassiopeia A explosion was observed on nearby gas clouds using Spitzer Space Telescope. The infrared echo was also seen by IRAS and studied with the Infrared Spectrograph. Previously it was suspected that a flare in 1950 from a central pulsar could be responsible for the infrared echo. With the new data it was concluded that this is unlikely the case and that the infrared echo was caused by thermal emission by dust, which was heated by the radiative output of the supernova during the shock breakout. The infrared echo is accompanied by a scattered light echo. The recorded spectrum of the optical light echo proved the supernova was of Type IIb, meaning it resulted from the internal collapse and violent explosion of a massive star, most probably a red supergiant with a helium core which had lost almost all of its hydrogen envelope. This was the first observation of the light echo of a supernova whose explosion had not been directly observed which opens up the possibility of studying and reconstructing past astronomical events. In 2011 a study used spectra from different positions of the light echo to confirm that the Cassiopeia A supernova was asymmetric.
Phosphorus detection
In 2013, astronomers detected phosphorus in Cassiopeia A, which confirmed that this element is produced in supernovae through supernova nucleosynthesis. The phosphorus-to-iron ratio in material from the supernova remnant could be up to 100times higher than in the Milky Way in general.
Gallery
A false color image composed of data from three sources: Red is infrared data from the Spitzer Space Telescope, gold is visible data from the Hubble Space Telescope, and blue and green are data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory. The small, bright, baby-blue dot just off-center is the remnant of the star's core.
Cassiopeia A infrared echo as seen by unWISE. The observation time in this image ranges from 2015 (red) to 2020 (blue). The infrared echo appears as rainbow colored clouds. North is up.
The infrared echo caused by the CassiopeiaA supernova seen by Spitzer. The image was processed in a way that the infrared echo appears colored while dust clouds remain grey. North is on the left.
12345Fesen, Robert A.; Hammell, Molly C.; Morse, Jon; Chevalier, Roger A.; Borkowski, Kazimierz J.; Dopita, Michael A.; Gerardy, Christopher L.; Lawrence, Stephen S.; Raymond, John C.; van den Bergh, Sidney (July 2006). "The expansion asymmetry and age of the CassiopeiaA supernova remnant". The Astrophysical Journal. 645 (1): 283–292. arXiv:astro-ph/0603371. Bibcode:2006ApJ...645..283F. doi:10.1086/504254. S2CID8999768.
12Stover, Dawn (2006). "Life in a bubble". Popular Science. Vol.269, no.6. p.16.
↑Banich, Howard (December 2014). "A visual guide to the CassiopeiaA supernova remnant". Sky & Telescope.
12Baars, J.W.M.; Genzel, R.; Pauliny-Toth, I.I.K.; Witzel, A. (1977). "The absolute spectrum of CasA; an accurate flux density scale and a set of secondary calibrators". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 61: 99. Bibcode:1977A&A....61...99B.
↑Bowyer S, Byram ET, Chubb TA, Friedman H (1965). "Observational results of X-ray astronomy". In Steinberg JL (ed.). Astronomical Observations from Space Vehicles, Proceedings from Symposium No.23 Held in Liege, Belgium, 17 to 20August 1964. Astronomical Observations from Space Vehicles. Vol.23. International Astronomical Union. pp.227–239. Bibcode:1965IAUS...23..227B.
↑Rest, A.; Foley, R. J.; Sinnott, B.; Welch, D. L.; Badenes, C.; Filippenko, A. V.; Bergmann, M.; Bhatti, W. A.; Blondin, S.; Challis, P.; Damke, G. (May 2011). "Direct Confirmation of the Asymmetry of the Cas A Supernova with Light Echoes". Astrophysical Journal. 732 (1): 3. arXiv:1003.5660. Bibcode:2011ApJ...732....3R. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/732/1/3. ISSN0004-637X. S2CID119266059.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cassiopeia A.
Arcand, Kimberly K.; Jiang, Elaine; Price, Sara; Watzke, Megan; Sgouros, Tom; Edmonds, Peter (15 December 2018). "Walking through an exploded star: Rendering supernova remnant CassiopeiaA into virtual reality". Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal. 24: 17. arXiv:1812.06237. Bibcode:2018CAPJ...24...17A.