This article is missing information about related decisions, such as the decisions of 21 November 1927, 16 December 1927, 13 September 1928, and 25 May 1929. (September 2026) |
| The Chorzów Factory case | |
|---|---|
| Court | Permanent Court of International Justice |
| Full case name | Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v. Poland) |
| Decided | 26 July 1927 |
| Citations | Factory at Chorzów (Germany v. Poland), Jurisdiction, 1927 P.C.I.J. (Ser. A) No. 9 (26 July). |
| Case history | |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Court membership | |
| President |
|
| Associate judges | Robert Finlay · Didrik Nyholm · John Bassett Moore · Antonio Sánchez de Bustamante y Sirven · Rafael Altamira y Crevea · Yorozu Oda · Dionisio Anzilotti · Epitácio da Silva Pessoa · Mihailo Jovanović · Ernst Rabel · Ludwik Ehrlich |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Huber |
| Dissent | Ehrlich |
The Chorzów Factory case (Germany v. Poland) 1927 P.C.I.J. (Ser. A) No. 9 (26 July) (French: Affaire relative à l'usine de Chorzów) was a case before the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1927. It was an early authority in international law that established a number of precedents in international law.
In the Upper Silesia plebiscite a majority of 31,864 voters voted to remain in Germany while 10,764 votes were given for Poland. Following three Silesian Uprisings, the eastern part of Upper Silesia, including Chorzów and Królewska Huta, was separated from Germany and awarded to Poland in 1922. Migrations of people followed. Because of its strategic value, the case of the nitrate factory Oberschlesische Stickstoffwerke was argued for years before the Permanent Court of International Justice, finally setting some new legal precedents on what is "just" in international relations.
The Court held that: