World Chess Championship 1960

World Chess Championship 1960
 
Defending champion

Challenger
 
Mikhail Botvinnik
Mikhail Botvinnik
Mikhail Tal
Mikhail Tal
  Soviet Union Mikhail Botvinnik Soviet Union Mikhail Tal
 
8½Scores12½
  Born 17 August 1911
48 years old
Born 9 November 1936
23 years old
  Winner of the 1958 World Chess Championship Winner of the 1959 Candidates Tournament
← 1958
1961 →

A World Chess Championship was played between Mikhail Botvinnik and Mikhail Tal in Moscow from March 15 to May 7, 1960. Botvinnik was the reigning champion, after winning the World Chess Championship 1958, while Tal qualified by winning the Candidates tournament. Tal won by a margin of 4 points.

Zonals

The 1958 USSR Chess Championship was a zonal, with the first four finishers qualifying for the 1958 Interzonal. The final leading scores were Tal 12½/18, Petrosian 12, Bronstein 11½ and Averbakh 11 qualifying; ahead of Boris Spassky and Lev Polugaevsky on 10½. Spassky had a strong position against Tal in the final round, but pushed too hard for a win, and lost.

The 1957/8 US Chess Championship was a zonal, with the first two finishers qualifying. The final leading scores were Bobby Fischer on 10½/13, Samuel Reshevsky on 9½ and James Sherwin on 9. Reshevsky declined his invitation to the interzonal, so the qualifiers were Fischer and Sherwin.

1958 Interzonal tournament

An interzonal chess tournament was held in Portorož, SR Slovenia, SFR Yugoslavia, in August and September 1958. The top six finishers qualified for the Candidates Tournament.

Before the final round, the leaders were: (1st) Tal 13; (2nd–3rd) Gligoric, Petrosian 12½ (though Petrosian had the bye in the last round); (4th) Benko 12; (5th–6th) Fischer, Bronstein 11½; (7th–10th) Olafsson, Averbakh, Szabo, Pachman 11. In the final round Fischer had black against Gligoric; while Bronstein, Olafsson, Szabo and Pachman had relatively weaker opponents. Feeling he was forced to play for a win, Fischer played the risky but double-edged Goteborg variation of the Sicilian Najdorf. Later, while the Gligoric–Fischer game was in a critical position with Fischer having some advantage, Fischer saw that Bronstein was unexpectedly losing to Cardoso. So Fischer accepted a draw, qualifying for the Candidates. Of the players on 11 points, only Olafsson won, joining Fischer in the last two qualifying positions.

1958 Interzonal Tournament
123456789101112131415161718192021Total
1 Mikhail Tal (Soviet Union)x½½1½½½½01½11½½1½1½1113½
2 Svetozar Gligorić (Yugoslavia)½x½½0½½½½½11½½110111113
3 Tigran Petrosian (Soviet Union)½½x½½½½½1½1½½½½0111½112½
4 Pal Benko (stateless)0½½x½1½11½½0½1½½½½11112½
5 Friðrik Ólafsson (Iceland)½1½½x101½1½½½½010011112
6 Bobby Fischer (United States)½½½00x½½½½½½½1½11½11112
7 David Bronstein (Soviet Union)½½½½1½x½½½1½½½½½1½0½111½
8 Yuri Averbakh (Soviet Union)½½½00½½x10½½½111½1½½111½
9 Aleksandar Matanović (Yugoslavia)1½00½½½0x1½½½½½11½1½111½
10 László Szabó (Hungary)0½½½0½½10x½½1½0½1111111½
11 Ludek Pachman (Czechoslovakia)½00½½½0½½½x½½½111½11111½
12 Oscar Panno (Argentina)00½1½½½½½½½x½1½½1½1½½11
13 Miroslav Filip (Czechoslovakia)0½½½½½½½½0½½x½1½½½11111
14 Raúl Sanguineti (Argentina)½½½0½0½0½½½0½x1½11½1½10
15 Oleg Neikirch (Bulgaria)½0½½1½½0½10½00x0½11½19½
16 Bent Larsen (Denmark)001½00½00½0½½½1x11½018½
17 James Sherwin (United States)½10½100½0000½0½0x10117½
18 Héctor Rossetto (Argentina)000½1½½0½0½½½0000x1½17
19 Rodolfo Cardoso (Philippines)½000001½00000½0½10x116
20 Boris de Greiff (Colombia)00½000½½½00½00½10½0x04½
21 Géza Füster (Canada)00000000000½0½000001x2

1959 Candidates Tournament

The 1959 Candidates Tournament was held in Yugoslavia in Bled, Zagreb, and Belgrade in September and October 1959. The top two players from the previous tournament, Vasily Smyslov and Paul Keres, were seeded directly into the tournament and joined by the top six from the interzonal. Mikhail Tal won, becoming the challenger in the 1960 championship match.

The tournament was notable in that the two top finishers, Tal and Keres, scored heavily against the bottom of the field. If only scores between the top four are taken into account, the results of the top four are quite similar (Tal 5½/12, Keres 6½/12, Petrosian and Smyslov both 6/12). But Tal and Keres scored heavily against the bottom four, with Tal scoring an incredible 14½/16, including winning all four of his games against Fischer.

Future world champion Bobby Fischer was 16 years old at the time. He was the youngest Candidate in history until Magnus Carlsen qualified for the 2007 Candidates under a different system.

1959 Candidates Tournament
12345678Score
1 Mikhail Tal (Soviet Union)xxxx0 0 1 0½ ½ ½ ½0 1 ½ 11 ½ 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 ½1 1 1 ½20
2 Paul Keres (Soviet Union)1 1 0 1xxxx0 ½ ½ ½1 ½ ½ 0½ ½ 1 10 1 0 11 1 1 01 1 1 118½
3 Tigran Petrosian (Soviet Union)½ ½ ½ ½1 ½ ½ ½xxxx½ ½ 0 ½0 ½ ½ 11 1 ½ ½1 0 0 ½½ 1 1 ½15½
4 Vasily Smyslov (Soviet Union)1 0 ½ 00 ½ ½ 1½ ½ 1 ½xxxx0 ½ 1 0½ ½ 1 0½ 1 ½ 1½ 0 1 115
5 Svetozar Gligorić (Yugoslavia)0 ½ 0 0½ ½ 0 01 ½ ½ 01 ½ 0 1xxxx0 1 ½ ½½ ½ 1 0½ 1 ½ ½12½
6 Bobby Fischer (United States)0 0 0 01 0 1 00 0 ½ ½½ ½ 0 11 0 ½ ½xxxx0 1 ½ 1½ 1 ½ 112½
7 Friðrik Ólafsson (Iceland)0 0 0 ½0 0 0 10 1 1 ½½ 0 ½ 0½ ½ 0 11 0 ½ 0xxxx0 0 ½ 110
8Pal Benko (stateless)0 0 0 ½0 0 0 0½ 0 0 ½½ 1 0 0½ 0 ½ ½½ 0 ½ 01 1 ½ 0xxxx8

Round 1, Bled

The 1959 Candidates was the first time Tal and Smyslov played each other in a tournament. The adjourned games Smyslov–Tal and Keres–Fischer were completed on Wednesday September 9.

Round 1, Bled, Monday September 7
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
SmyslovTal1–0Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation65
KeresFischer0–1Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation53
PetrosianOlafsson1–0Nimzo-Indian Defense, Three Knights Variation37
BenkoGligorić½–½King's Indian Defense35

Round 2, Bled

Tal–Gligorić was the only game to finish in the first session of play.

Round 2, Bled, Tuesday September 8
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Fischer (1)Petrosian (1)0–1Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation68
Smyslov (1)Keres (0)0–1Ruy Lopez, Chigorin Defense59
Tal (0)Gligorić (½)1–0King's Indian Defence, Sämisch Variation47
Olafsson (0)Benko (½)0–1Ruy Lopez, Flohr–Zaitsev Variation54

Round 3, Bled

Round 3, Bled, Thursday September 10
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Petrosian (2)Smyslov (1)½–½English Opening, Reversed Sicilian60
Benko (1½)Fischer (1)½–½King's Indian Defense49
Keres (1)Tal (1)1–0English Opening64
Gligorić (½)Olafsson (0)½–½Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System54

Round 4, Bled

Round 4, Bled, Friday September 11
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Keres (2)Petrosian (2½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind51
Smyslov (1½)Benko (2)½–½Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation28
Fischer (1½)Gligorić (1)1–0Sicilian Defense, Dragon Variation32
Tal (1)Olafsson (½)1–0Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation42

Round 5, Bled

Petrosian and Tal made the first "grandmaster draw" in this tournament with their game lasting only 12 moves. Benko lost on time, and his written protest to the tournament committee was denied after the chess clock was examined and found to be working correctly.

Round 5, Bled, Monday September 14
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Petrosian (3½)Tal (2)½–½Semi-Tarrasch Defense12
Benko (2½)Keres (2)0–1English Opening, Reverse Sicilian39
Olafsson (½)Fischer (2½)1–0Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation45
Gligorić (1)Smyslov (2)1–0Slav Defense38

Round 6, Bled

Round 6, Bled, Tuesday September 15
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Petrosian (4)Benko (2½)½–½King's Indian Defense, Fianchetto Variation42
Keres (3)Gligorić (2)½–½Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense66
Tal (2½)Fischer (2½)1–0King's Indian Defense, Petrosian Variation41
Smyslov (2)Olafsson (1½)½–½Sicilian Defense, Kan Variation67

Round 7, Bled

Round 7, Bled, Thursday September 17
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Gligorić (2½)Petrosian (4½)1–0Caro–Kann Defense, Classical Variation40
Benko (3)Tal (3½)0–1Dutch Defense29
Olafsson (2)Keres (3½)0–1Réti Opening40
Fischer (2½)Smyslov (2½)½–½Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation41

Round 8, Belgrade

Round 8, Belgrade, Friday September 18
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (4½)Smyslov (3)1–0Caro–Kann Defense26
Fischer (3)Keres (4½)0–1Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation30
Olafsson (2)Petrosian (4½)1–0Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation66
Gligorić (3½)Benko (3)1–0Ruy Lopez, Breyer Defense55

Round 9, Belgrade

Round 9, Belgrade, Monday September 21
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Gligorić (4½)Tal (5½)½–½Ruy Lopez, Chigorin Defense26
Keres (5½)Smyslov (3)½–½Ruy Lopez41
Petrosian (4½)Fischer (3)1–0Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System31
Benko (3)Olafsson (4½)1–0Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation42

Round 10, Belgrade

Round 10, Belgrade, Tuesday September 22
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (6)Keres (6)0–1Nimzo-Indian Defense, 4.f340
Smyslov (3½)Petrosian (5½)½–½English Opening28
Olafsson (3)Gligorić (5)½–½King's Indian Defense73
Fischer (3)Benko (4)1–0Sicilian Defense27

Round 11, Belgrade

Round 11, Belgrade, Thursday September 24
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Petrosian (6)Keres (7)½–½English Opening, Reversed Sicilian25
Olafsson (3½)Tal (6)0–1Sicilian Defense, Kan Variation71
Gligorić (5½)Fischer (4)1–0Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation43
Benko (4)Smyslov (4)1–0Sicilian Defense, Kan Variation74

Round 12, Belgrade

Round 12, Belgrade, Friday September 25
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Keres (7½)Benko (5)1–0Ruy Lopez, Breyer Variation21
Tal (7)Petrosian (6½)½–½Ruy Lopez, Chigorin Variation23
Smyslov (4)Gligorić (6½)½–½Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System59
Fischer (4)Olafsson (3½)1–0Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Variation78

Round 13, Belgrade

Round 13, Belgrade, Monday September 28
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Gligorić (7)Keres (8½)½–½Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System72
Fischer (5)Tal (7½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation33
Benko (5)Petrosian (7)0–1Réti Opening34
Olafsson (3½)Smyslov (4½)0–1English Opening, Reversed Sicilian57

Round 14, Belgrade

Round 14, Belgrade, Tuesday September 29
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Keres (9)Olafsson (3½)1–0Sicilian Defense, Kan Variation41
Tal (8½)Benko (5)1–0Sicilian Defense, Hyper-Accelerated Dragon Variation30
Petrosian (8)Gligorić (7½)½–½English Opening, Symmetrical Variation18
Smyslov (5½)Fischer (5)½–½Sicilian Defense, Delayed Alapin Variation46

Round 15, Zagreb

Round 15, Zagreb, Saturday October 3
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Keres (10)Fischer (5½)0–1London System27
Smyslov (6)Tal (9½)½–½Sicilian Defense, Kan Variation46
Petrosian (8½)Olafsson (3½)0–1Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System76
Benko (5)Gligorić (8)½–½Semi-Tarrasch Defense44

Round 16, Zagreb

Tal's win against Gligorić in round 16 gave him the tournament lead over Keres, and he never relinquished it.

Round 16, Zagreb, Sunday October 4
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (10)Gligorić (8½)1–0Queen's Indian Defense64
Smyslov (6½)Keres (10)½–½Nimzo-Indian Defense. Rubinstein System35
Fischer (6½)Petrosian (8½)½–½Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation48
Olafsson (4½)Benko (5½)½–½English Opening, Symmetrical Variation32

Round 17, Zagreb

After the tournament, Tal said the turning point was his round 17 win over Keres that gave him a 1½-point lead.

Round 17, Zagreb, Tuesday October 6
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Keres (10½)Tal (11)0–1Sicilian Defense, Kan Variation40
Petrosian (9)Smyslov (7)0–1Queen's Gambit Accepted39
Benko (6)Fischer (7)½–½Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation64
Gligorić (8½)Olafsson (5)1–0Ruy Lopez, Closed with 9...Nd751

Round 18, Zagreb

Round 18, Zagreb, Wednesday October 7
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (12)Olafsson (5)1–0Ruy Lopez, Closed with 9...Nd742
Keres (10½)Petrosian (9)½–½Caro–Kann Defense, Panov Attack18
Fischer (7½)Gligorić (9½)½–½Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense39
Smyslov (8)Benko (6½)1–0King's Indian Defense, Petrosian Variation53

Round 19, Zagreb

Round 18, Zagreb, Saturday October 10
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Petrosian (9½)Tal (13)½–½Nimzo-Indian Defense, Classical Variation15
Benko (6½)Keres (11)0–1English Opening, Reversed Sicilian41
Gligorić (10)Smyslov (9)0–1Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System50
Olafsson (5)Fischer (8)½–½King's Indian Defense, Fianchetto Variation40

Round 20, Zagreb

Round 20, Zagreb, Sunday October 11
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (13½)Fischer (8½)1–0King's Indian Defense, Petrosian Variation34
Keres (12)Gligorić (10)1–0Ruy Lopez, Chigorin Defense45
Petrosian (10)Benko (6½)1–0Nimzo-Indian Defense, Leningrad Variation41
Smyslov (10)Olafsson (5½)½–½Sicilian Defense, Grand Prix Attack37

Round 21, Zagreb

Round 21, Zagreb, Tuesday October 13
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Benko (6½)Tal (14½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation33
Olafsson (6)Keres (13)0–1Queen's Gambit Accepted35
Gligorić (10)Petrosian (11)½–½French Defense, Winawer Variation41
Fischer (8½)Smyslov (10½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Scheveningen Variation48

Round 22, Zagreb

Round 22, Zagreb, Sunday October 18
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (15½)Smyslov (11½)1–0Sicilian Defense, Scheveningen Variation41
Fischer (8½)Keres (14)0–1Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation55
Olafsson (6)Petrosian (11½)½–½Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower Defense41
Gligorić (10½)Benko (6½)½–½Sicilian Defense, Richter-Rauzer Variation57

Round 23, Belgrade

Round 23, Belgrade, Monday October 19
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Gligorić (11)Tal (16½)0–1Modern Benoni46
Keres (15)Smyslov (11½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Scheveningen Variation40
Petrosian (12)Fischer (8½)½–½Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower Defense30
Benko (7)Olafsson (6½)0–1Queen's Gambit Accepted44

Round 24, Belgrade

Round 24, Belgrade, Wednesday October 21
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (17½)Keres (15)0–1Tarrasch Defense79
Smyslov (12½)Petrosian (12½)½–½King's Indian Defense23
Olafsson (7½)Gligorić (11)1–0King's Indian Defense, Petrosian Variation70
Fischer (9)Benko (7)1–0Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation39

Round 25, Belgrade

Round 25, Belgrade, Thursday October 22
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Olafsson (8½)Tal (17½)0–1King's Indian Defense, Fianchetto Variation17
Petrosian (13)Keres (16)1–0Tarrasch Defense18
Benko (7)Smyslov (13)1–0Catalan Opening34
Gligorić (11)Fischer (10)½–½Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation57

Round 26, Belgrade

Round 26, Belgrade, Sunday October 25
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (18)Petrosian (13½)½–½Sicilian Defense25
Keres (16½)Benko (7)1–0Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation23
Smyslov (14)Gligorić (11½)0–1King's Indian Defense18
Fischer (10½)Olafsson (9)1–0Caro–Kann Defense, Two Knights Variation41

Round 27, Belgrade

Round 27, Belgrade, Monday October 26
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Fischer (11½)Tal (18½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation52
Gligorić (12½)Keres (17½)0–1Nimzo-Indian Defense, Rubinstein System40
Olafsson (9)Smyslov (14)0–1English Opening, Reversed Sicilian41
Benko (7)Petrosian (14)½–½Queen's Gambit Accepted43

Round 28, Belgrade

Round 28, Belgrade, Thursday October 28
WhiteBlackResultOpeningMoves
Tal (19½)Benko (7½)½–½Sicilian Defense, Hyper-Accelerated Dragon22
Keres (18½)Olafsson (9)0–1Sicilian Defense, O'Kelly Variation40
Smyslov (15)Fischer (11½)0–1Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation54
Petrosian (14½)Gligorić (12½)1–0King's Indian Defense, Petrosian Variation45

1960 Championship match

The best of 24 game match was held in Moscow. In the event of a 12–12 tie, Botvinnik, the title holder, would retain the Championship.

Due to Tal's less impressive results against the very top players, including his three losses to Keres in the Candidates, Botvinnik was the favorite. Tal won the match decisively, however, by a margin of 4 points.

World Chess Championship Match 1960
123456789101112131415161718192021Points
 Mikhail Tal (Soviet Union) 1½½½½1100½1½½½½½1½1½½12½
 Mikhail Botvinnik (Soviet Union) 0½½½½0011½0½½½½½0½0½½8½

Game 1: Tal–Botvinnik, 1–0

Tal–Botvinnik, game 1
abcdefgh
8
g8 black rook
a7 black pawn
c7 black king
f7 black queen
b6 black pawn
c6 black bishop
g6 black knight
d5 black pawn
f5 black pawn
g5 white bishop
c4 white pawn
d4 white rook
h4 white pawn
a3 white pawn
e3 white pawn
g2 white pawn
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 29.c4. Here Tal remarked that the move caused a forced material advantage for White, as 29...Ne7 can be met by 30.cxd5 Bxd5 (or 30...Nxd5 31.Bc4) 31.Bxe7 Qxe7 32.Qc1+ which would have been completely lost for Black.
French Defence, Winawer Variation (ECO C18)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bc3 6.bc3 Qc7 7.Qg4 f5 8.Qg3 Ne7 9.Qg7 Rg8 10.Qh7 cd4 11.Kd1 Bd7 12.Qh5 Ng6 13.Ne2 d3 14.cd3 Ba4 15.Ke1 Qe5 16.Bg5 Nc6 17.d4 Qc7 18.h4 e5 19.Rh3 Qf7 20.de5 Nce5 21.Re3 Kd7 22.Rb1 b6 23.Nf4 Rae8 24.Rb4 Bc6 25.Qd1 Nf4 26.Rf4 Ng6 27.Rd4 Re3 28.fe3 Kc7 29.c4 (see diagram) dc4 30.Bc4 Qg7 31.Bg8 Qg8 32.h5 1–0

Game 6: Botvinnik–Tal, 0–1

Botvinnik–Tal, game 6
abcdefgh
8
c8 black rook
g8 black king
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
g7 black bishop
h7 black pawn
d6 black pawn
g6 black pawn
d5 white pawn
e5 black pawn
f5 black bishop
h5 black knight
b4 black queen
c4 black rook
c3 white knight
e3 white bishop
g3 white pawn
h3 white pawn
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
e2 white queen
f2 white pawn
g2 white bishop
h2 white king
a1 white rook
c1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 21.Ra1. Tal now sacrificed a knight with the speculative 21...Nf4!?, and won in the ensuing complications.

Game 6 is particularly famous, thanks to a speculative knight sacrifice by Tal on move 21. The audience became so excited that the game was moved to a back room due to the noise.

King's Indian Defence, Fianchetto Variation (ECO E69)
1.c4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 0-0 5.d4 d6 6.Nc3 Nbd7 7.0-0 e5 8.e4 c6 9.h3 Qb6 10.d5 cd5 11.cd5 Nc5 12.Ne1 Bd7 13.Nd3 Nd3 14.Qd3 Rfc8 15.Rb1 Nh5 16.Be3 Qb4 17.Qe2 Rc4 18.Rfc1 Rac8 19.Kh2 f5 20.ef5 Bf5 21.Ra1 (see diagram) Nf4 22.gf4 ef4 23.Bd2 Qb2 24.Rab1 f3 25.Rb2 fe2 26.Rb3 Rd4 27.Be1 Be5 28.Kg1 Bf4 29.Ne2 Rc1 30.Nd4 Re1 31.Bf1 Be4 32.Ne2 Be5 33.f4 Bf6 34.Rb7 Bd5 35.Rc7 Ba2 36.Ra7 Bc4 37.Ra8 Kf7 38.Ra7 Ke6 39.Ra3 d5 40.Kf2 Bh4 41.Kg2 Kd6 42.Ng3 Bg3 43.Bc4 dc4 44.Kg3 Kd5 45.Ra7 c3 46.Rc7 Kd4 47.Rd7 0–1

Game 17: Tal–Botvinnik, 1–0

Tal–Botvinnik, game 17
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
e8 black king
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
d7 black knight
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
c6 black pawn
d6 black bishop
e6 black pawn
f6 black knight
g6 black pawn
a5 black queen
g5 white bishop
c4 white bishop
d4 white pawn
f4 white pawn
g3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
d1 white queen
f1 white rook
g1 white king
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 12.f4

Game 17 was a 41-move win for Tal. Tal (White) described the move 12.f4 as "memorable". He believed that the move would throw Botvinnik off and that it could only be exploited by opening the game for Tal's bishops.

Caro–Kann Defence, Classical Variation (ECO B18)
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 de4 4.Ne4 Bf5 5.Ng3 Bg6 6.Bc4 e6 7.N1e2 Nf6 8.Nf4 Bd6 9.Ng6 hg6 10.Bg5 Nbd7 11.0-0 Qa5 12.f4 (diagram) 0-0-0 13.a3 Qc7 14.b4 Nb6 15.Be2 Be7 16.Qd3 Nfd5 17.Be7 Qe7 18.c4 Nf6 19.Rab1 Qd7 20.Rbd1 Kb8 21.Qb3 Qc7 22.a4 Rh4 23.a5 Nc8 24.Qe3 Ne7 25.Qe5 Rhh8 26.b5 cb5 27.Qb5 a6 28.Qb2 Rd7 29.c5 Ka8 30.Bf3 Nc6 31.Bc6 Qc6 32.Rf3 Qa4 33.Rfd3 Rc8 34.Rb1 Qa5 35.Rb3 Qc7 36.Qa3 Ka7 37.Rb6 Qf4 38.Ne2 Qe4 39.Qb3 Qd5 40.Ra6 Kb8 41.Qa4 1–0

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 Zonals 1957-1960, Mark Weeks's Chess pages
  2. ↑ From Morphy to Fischer, Israel Horowitz, Batsford, 1973, p.178
  3. ↑ "World Chess Championship 1958 Interzonal Tournament". mark-weeks.com. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
  4. 1 2 "Portoroz Interzonal (1958)". Chessgames Services LLC. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  5. ↑ First anniversary of Bobby Fischer's death, Chessbase, 1/17/2009
  6. ↑ 1959 Yugoslavia Candidates Tournament, Mark Weeks' chess pages
  7. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 37.
  8. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 38.
  9. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 39.
  10. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 40–41.
  11. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 40.
  12. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 41.
  13. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 42–43.
  14. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 43.
  15. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 44.
  16. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 45.
  17. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 46.
  18. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 47.
  19. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 49.
  20. 1 2 3 4 Golombek 2004, p. 50.
  21. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 51.
  22. 1 2 3 Golombek 2004, p. 52.
  23. 1 2 Golombek 2004, p. 53.
  24. 1 2 3 Golombek 2004, p. 54.
  25. ↑ Golombek 2004, p. 55.
  26. 1 2 Clash of Champions: Tal vs. Botvinnik, Bryan Smith, chess.com, September 4 2014
  27. ↑ Mikhail Tal, chess.com, September 19 2022

References