Short integer solution (SIS) and ring-SIS problems are two average-case problems that are used in lattice-based cryptography constructions. Lattice-based cryptography began in 1996 from a seminal work by Miklós Ajtai who presented a family of one-way functions based on SIS problem. He showed that it is secure in an average case if the shortest vector problem
(where
for some constant
) is hard in a worst-case scenario.
Average case problems are the problems that are hard to be solved for some randomly selected instances. For cryptography applications, worst case complexity is not sufficient, and we need to guarantee cryptographic construction are hard based on average case complexity.
Lattices
A full rank lattice
is a set of integer linear combinations of
linearly independent vectors
, named basis:

where
is a matrix having basis vectors in its columns.
Remark: Given
two bases for lattice
, there exist unimodular matrices
such that
.
Ideal lattice
Definition: Rotational shift operator on
is denoted by
, and is defined as:

Cyclic lattices
Micciancio introduced cyclic lattices in his work in generalizing the compact knapsack problem to arbitrary rings. A cyclic lattice is a lattice that is closed under rotational shift operator. Formally, cyclic lattices are defined as follows:
Definition: A lattice
is cyclic if
.
Examples:
itself is a cyclic lattice.- Lattices corresponding to any ideal in the quotient polynomial ring
are cyclic:
consider the quotient polynomial ring
, and let
be some polynomial in
, i.e.
where
for
.
Define the embedding coefficient
-module isomorphism
as:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad \rho :R&\rightarrow \mathbb {Z} ^{n}\\[4pt]p(x)=\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}a_{i}x^{i}&\mapsto (a_{0},\ldots ,a_{n-1})\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3b19ef05928355e61a925130e56f50ce32cae8b4)
Let
be an ideal. The lattice corresponding to ideal
, denoted by
, is a sublattice of
, and is defined as

Theorem:
is cyclic if and only if
corresponds to some ideal
in the quotient polynomial ring
.
proof:
We have:

Let
be an arbitrary element in
. Then, define
. But since
is an ideal, we have
. Then,
. But,
. Hence,
is cyclic.

Let
be a cyclic lattice. Hence
.
Define the set of polynomials
:
- Since
a lattice and hence an additive subgroup of
,
is an additive subgroup of
. - Since
is cyclic,
.
Hence,
is an ideal, and consequently,
.
Ideal lattices
Let
be a monic polynomial of degree
. For cryptographic applications,
is usually selected to be irreducible. The ideal generated by
is:
![{\displaystyle (f(x)):=f(x)\cdot \mathbb {Z} [x]=\{f(x)g(x):\forall g(x)\in \mathbb {Z} [x]\}.}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c970d48b2090104e40be59fc404919c712d29107)
The quotient polynomial ring
partitions
into equivalence classes of polynomials of degree at most
:
![{\displaystyle R=\mathbb {Z} [x]/(f(x))=\left\{\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}a_{i}x^{i}:a_{i}\in \mathbb {Z} \right\}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a93ba3d1d81e47803821bcde400820a3f39cef90)
where addition and multiplication are reduced modulo
.
Consider the embedding coefficient
-module isomorphism
. Then, each ideal in
defines a sublattice of
called ideal lattice.
Definition:
, the lattice corresponding to an ideal
, is called ideal lattice. More precisely, consider a quotient polynomial ring
, where
is the ideal generated by a degree
polynomial
.
, is a sublattice of
, and is defined as:

Remark:
- It turns out that
for even small
is typically easy on ideal lattices. The intuition is that the algebraic symmetries causes the minimum distance of an ideal to lie within a narrow, easily computable range. - By exploiting the provided algebraic symmetries in ideal lattices, one can convert a short nonzero vector into
linearly independent ones of (nearly) the same length. Therefore, on ideal lattices,
and
are equivalent with a small loss. Furthermore, even for quantum algorithms,
and
are believed to be very hard in the worst-case scenario.
Short integer solution problem
The Short Integer Solution (SIS) problem is an average case problem that is used in lattice-based cryptography constructions. Lattice-based cryptography began in 1996 from a seminal work by Ajtai who presented a family of one-way functions based on the SIS problem. He showed that it is secure in an average case if
(where
for some constant
) is hard in a worst-case scenario. Along with applications in classical cryptography, the SIS problem and its variants are utilized in several post-quantum security schemes including CRYSTALS-Dilithium and Falcon.
SISq,n,m,β
Let
be an
matrix with entries in
that consists of
uniformly random vectors
:
. Find a nonzero vector
such that for some norm
:
,
.
A solution to SIS without the required constraint on the length of the solution (
) is easy to compute by using Gaussian elimination technique. We also require
, otherwise
is a trivial solution.
In order to guarantee
has non-trivial, short solution, we require:
, and
Theorem: For any
, any
, and any sufficiently large
(for any constant
), solving
with nonnegligible probability is at least as hard as solving the
and
for some
with a high probability in the worst-case scenario.
R-SISq,n,m,β
The SIS problem solved over an ideal ring is also called the Ring-SIS or R-SIS problem. This problem considers a quotient polynomial ring
with
for some integer
and with some norm
. Of particular interest are cases where there exists integer
such that
as this restricts the quotient to cyclotomic polynomials.
We then define the problem as follows:
Select
independent uniformly random elements
. Define vector
. Find a nonzero vector
such that:
,
.
Recall that to guarantee existence of a solution to SIS problem, we require
. However, Ring-SIS problem provide us with more compactness and efficacy: to guarantee existence of a solution to Ring-SIS problem, we require
.
Definition: The nega-circulant matrix of
is defined as:
![{\displaystyle {\text{for}}\quad b=\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}b_{i}x^{i}\in R,\quad \operatorname {rot} (b):={\begin{bmatrix}b_{0}&-b_{n-1}&\ldots &-b_{1}\\[0.3em]b_{1}&b_{0}&\ldots &-b_{2}\\[0.3em]\vdots &\vdots &\ddots &\vdots \\[0.3em]b_{n-1}&b_{n-2}&\ldots &b_{0}\end{bmatrix}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3a9663affde7dc867475147d16af19f77f691c05)
When the quotient polynomial ring is
for
, the ring multiplication
can be efficiently computed by first forming
, the nega-circulant matrix of
, and then multiplying
with
, the embedding coefficient vector of
(or, alternatively with
, the canonical coefficient vector.
Moreover, R-SIS problem is a special case of SIS problem where the matrix
in the SIS problem is restricted to negacirculant blocks:
.
M-SISq,n,d,m,β
The SIS problem solved over a module lattice is also called the Module-SIS or M-SIS problem. Like R-SIS, this problem considers the quotient polynomial ring
and
for
with a special interest in cases where
is a power of 2. Then, let
be a module of rank
such that
and let
be an arbitrary norm over
.
We then define the problem as follows:
Select
independent uniformly random elements
. Define vector
. Find a nonzero vector
such that:
,
.
While M-SIS is a less compact variant of SIS than R-SIS, the M-SIS problem is asymptotically at least as hard as R-SIS and therefore gives a tighter bound on the hardness assumption of SIS. This makes assuming the hardness of M-SIS a safer, but less efficient underlying assumption when compared to R-SIS.
See also
References