To nominate an article for deletion or merging, follow these instructions.
Article was redirected because none of the source gave any indepth coverage to this 7 minute film. Best sources I could find are barely more than a passing mention, like this one or database-like entries like this one. Enough for a short entry in a list, not enough to warrant a stand-alone article. Redirect was reverted, so AfD it is. Fram (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to Vocable because of overlap. Both articles discussion vocables—the only difference is one of them describes a specific application of vocable. There is also insufficient notability for this topic to be two articles. XiaoTuZi.LittleRabbit (talk) 00:40, 20 October 2026 (UTC)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Glenn, bankruptcy judges tend not to be notable, and the sources here do not establish notability. Reywas92Talk 15:47, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
Paid article about the acting director of a local chamber of commerce. Sources are all interviews or WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA. 🄻os🄰 19:21, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to University of Ibadan -- this is generally a run of the mill university library. 🄻os🄰 19:36, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
2020-09 ✍️ create ← 2020-06 ✗ R2 ← 2020-06 move to → Draft:Kenneth Dike Library, University of Ibadan ← 2020-06 ✗ G12Has one line of text stating that it is a unisex name or surname of English origin, clearly doesn't meet WP:GNG Ar1201u1 (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging redirecting to Ministry of Finance and Economy (Dominican Republic) because no sources could be found, only sources present in the article is just a passing mention. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 08:15, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I am proposing this article to be deleted primarily because it seems to be an essay made by an editor, supported by their own interpretations of ancient texts which do not mention the concept, which is the exact definition of original research. Looking at Google Scholar, this concept only has 11 hits, not to mention the concept hardly shows up in more general, non verbatim searches. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 01:08, 20 October 2026 (UTC)
Open for full review |
|---|
|
Full review:
|
HiddenHistoryPedia (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2026 (UTC)
This is clear WP:SIGCOV, but beyond that I could only find trivial announcements or reviews from unreliable sources, making this VR headset fail WP:GNG. I should note that while UploadVR covered it heavily, multiple articles from a single source can only count once for the purpose of GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:31, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Non-notable CEO of Tate & Lyle. Could not find significant non-routine coverage of his role. Not proposing a redirect since he appears to be stepping down soon (or recently did?) 1brianm7 (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some minor mentions and ROUTINE reportage....but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. Won't mind withdrawing if useful sources are located. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:44, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. Won't mind withdrawing if useful sources are located. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:43, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some ROUTINE reportage, some false positives and some directories....but nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:39, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield anything useful to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:35, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
This is a blatant WP:CONTENTFORK of Draft:List of DC Universe cast members, which has been developed for much longer, has a retention of the actual editing history of much of the contents of this fork to WP:PRESERVE said contributions, and the draft was previously contested from AfC submission over concerns that it lacked notability. The author of this list was made aware of that when they attempted a cut-and-paste move of the draft's title to add the "franchise" parenthetical disambiguator, yet they have clearly ignored concerns about this fork's existence and failed to engage with the draft editors to gauge whether consensus on notability has changed (it hasn't).
This list should remain incubating in the draftspace until consensus determines it yields independent notability beyond just 3 released films and 3 release shows' cast members being compiled together, especially when they may all be found in the individual media articles and do not have much content overlap that is discussed as a broad list topic amongst reputable sources. This DC franchise is still in its infancy, so while it may be tempting to replicate the work done on the MCU cast members list, this remains WP:TOOSOON in its own right. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 04:54, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose deleting due to the following reasons:
Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 23:13, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
Sources are not independent (interviews or Forbes) or only mention him briefly. Not notable. 🄻os🄰 18:53, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
Subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV with which to meet the WP:GNG. The only references here are primary to clubs that the subject has played for, and I couldn't find anything that was independent in my searches. Let'srun (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG The coverages are mostly routine including interviews, press releases, sponsored contents. There is no significant in-depth coverage required meeting notability standards. Most of the sources are about his company rather than the person himself. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:42, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG The coverages are mostly routine including, press releases, sponsored contents. There is no significant in-depth coverage required meeting notability standards. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that this satisfies WP:NSCHOOL or WP:NCORP in general, whichever is more appropriate. NewspaperSG doesn't give me much. The Berita Harian article contains a trivial mention of the school. The other relevant newspaper articles aren't indexed in NewsLink, as far as I know, so I suspect they might be advertisements or newspaper notices without anything signficant on the organisation. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 03:28, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations due to a lack of secondary sources, two of them being encyclopedia entries Emcgonigle (talk) 03:07, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to List of Marvel Comics characters: O because it cites no secondary sources. Emcgonigle (talk) 03:05, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations due to a lack of notable secondary sources. They have limited appearances in the comics as well. Emcgonigle (talk) 02:55, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Recreation of an article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidewalks and Skeletons in April 2016, when the sources offered were judged to be blogs without editorial oversight. The new version cites the same kind of material: music blogs and small webzines, a venue listing, label and promoter pages, an interview and database entries. The project does not meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG, and I could not find coverage in reliable publications. Ell Pollar (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
2016-04 (closed as ✗ Delete)2016-04 ✗ deletedFails WP:NCORP. Of the sources given that are still accessible and not doubly listed, only the LA Taco source is independent and secondary (~300 words about the subject), and even that is more of a column as opposed to an article, as is LA Taco's practice. The Velasquez source raises eyebrows and I strongly suspect an explicit COI with Tacos Gavilan there based off of searches.
Elsewhere, I can find this (one paragraph) and this (two); neither are exactly the epitome of source quality.
(Also, creator probably had a COI; the picture and logo are uploaded as their own work. I've emailed them to clarify the logo situation.) In solidarity, Iseult Δx talk to me 02:45, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Invalid dab entry. The film Cold Ones was re-titled Dead Letters prior to release, the Kanye West song is officially titled just "Cold" per its article (Cold (Kanye West song)), and that leaves just the slang term for alcohol. As such, this should be deleted and the Wiktionary link added to the sidebar of Cold One, the only work on Wikipedia with that name. Compare how Weather the Storm also has a Wiktionary sidebar. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • (What did I screw up now?) 18:46, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose redirecting to Line 6 (Changsha Metro) because per WP:NTRAINSTATION, train stations are not inherently notable. The only sources provided either here or on the other language versions are about the line in general and not specific stations with any individual station mentioned in passing, if at all. Anything I found apart from that is WP:RUNOFTHEMILL coverage of e.g. timetables. No indication that the individual stations pass WP:GNG Giulio 00:57, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Included in the nomination are:
I propose redirecting to List of generation III Pokémon#Mudkip. The article fails WP:GNG and is mostly unchanged from the last AFD. While there are some useful sources, there simply isn't enough to build an article around, especially with most sources on here being either primary, unreliable, or listicles. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:50, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
I propose merging to Tornado outbreak of May 15–16, 2025 because I'm fairly certain this doesn't have lasting coverage, but even if it does I'm just not convinced this event needs an article anyways. There really isn't anything here that couldn't be said in the outbreak article (aside from the tornado family bit, but I don't think that is too important). Perhaps I would say otherwise if the tornado summary or aftermath sections are too long to fit in the outbreak article, but they're not at the moment. I feel like this is a similar situation to the (former) 2016 Katie–Wynnewood tornado where the only reason this has an article at all is because of its EF4 rating, and a high rating alone doesn't warrant an article. tetradisulfate 00:50, 27 October 2026 (UTC)