Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

12 May 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

J. D. Scott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A longtime redirect to Oneok (for former Oneok chairman and CEO Scotty Scott) was hijacked as an WP:ADMASQ page for an Iowa deputy sheriff's self-published novel. The book is not notable, and beyond a human-interest story in his local newspaper I'm not seeing any WP:SIGCOV that would qualify for a pass of WP:GNG. I would have just restored the redirect but it was previously contested, so in the absence of passing WP:N I'm seeking an AfD consensus to restore the redirect to Oneok. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Police, and Iowa. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore redirect (possibly also revdel the content that is a contender for G11 to keep it from being restored easily). I cannot find any additional sources to support notability, doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR. Likely autobiography. Schazjmd (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daegu Yangnyeongsi Festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. A prod was removed in 2019 with an edit summary of "There are enough sources for this to go to AfD rather than PROD", but no sources were mentioned. SL93 (talk) 20:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Kennedy (educator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this article about a headteacher, and have not found significant coverage to add. There are mentions of him and quotes from him in a number of newspaper articles about schools, such as BBC Wales, Herald Wales and The Pembroke and Pembroke Dock Observer, but this is not coverage about Kennedy himself. An earlier version of the article gives more details about him, but is not better sourced. I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Tacyarg (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Schools, United Kingdom, and Wales. Tacyarg (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Trail (Wisconsin)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Sources cited are the "rock trail coalition" (a local volunteer group) and a database listing. WP:BEFORE turns up a number of murders along the trail at various times, but nothing conferring notability. — Moriwen (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. — Moriwen (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Rosa (footballer, born 1991)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player with few professional appearances, most for Minas Gerais state clubs in lower levels. Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Sportspeople, and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George Kamanda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional biography of a non-notable political adviser and lawyer. Fails all possible notability guidelines. The sources are limited to WP:PRIMARYSOURCE bios ([1]), affiliated sources like his university ([2]), his own writings ([3], [4]), and one source that doesn't even mention him ([5]). WP:BEFORE turns up more of the same but no WP:GNG-qualifying sources. Meanwhile, his books are WP:SELFPUBLISHED (Palmetto Publishing, CreateSpace, others, and his sole academic paper has not been cited once according to Google Scholar, so there are no WP:NBIO SNGs to hook onto here. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Sierra Leone. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Politicians, and Poetry. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom and my own search. Newspapers.com has nothing (though that isn't surprising), as does google scholar. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zeynep Heyzen Ateş

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Kadı Message 18:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Turkey, and New Zealand. Kadı Message 18:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Scott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability WP:Notability Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 18:12, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
del per WP:SIGCOV. The "SWPL Manager of the Year" is an "in-house" distinction of doubtful notability effect. --Altenmann >talk 18:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep were any searches for sources done? I found several. BBC, Edinburgh Reporter, Edinburgh Reporter 2, BBC 2, BBC 3, BBC 4, Edinburgh News, Glaswgow World, Sky Sports Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:39, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- were any searches for sources done? Yes - Q back: were any evaluations of sources done? . The the first two of yours are about "SWPL Manager of the Year" and no in-depth coverage beyond "how great a coach he is", i.e. IMHO no SIGCOV. --Altenmann >talk 20:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I did a search before nominating and came to the same conclusion. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which (just about) show notability. Giant Snowman 18:17, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroyuki Tazawa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He played exactly one season of football, back when he was 22. There are no real sources here, and it would need multiple pieces of independent significant coverage to warrant an article. Geschichte (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Four-hundred-year solar minimum of the 21st century

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR, cherrypicked sources. Title seems to be an invention by the article creator (or a translation from somewhere?) Article claims e.g. that the minimum will go from 2020 to 2053, and "it is expected to reduce the average global temperature by up to 1.0–1.5°C.", but the current second source[6] gives "They named the most likely scenario as a decrease in solar activity in the period up to 2100, but this will lead to only a small decrease in global temperature of about 0.08 ° C"? Url for third source is same as for second source, and first source is an editorial, not a peer-reviewed paper. I draftified the article to give a chance to correct these issues and let others have a look, but it was put back into the mainspace. Fram (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The plausibility and impacts of a grand solar minimum occurring in the 21st century have been discussed in the academic literature (e.g., [7], 2010; [8], 2013; [9], 2013; [10], 2015; [11], 2015), but I do not think that the coverage is WP:SIGNIFICANT enough to warrant its own dedicated article. Furthermore, more recent data from solar cycle 25 suggests that this scenario is unlikely. I think mentioning a hypothesized future minimum and its impacts in Solar minimum#Grand solar minima and maxima would be sufficient. I do not think a merge would be appropriate because the current content and refs are not suitable as mentioned by Fram. A relevant quote from [12] (2025):

"While earlier studies hypothesized that solar activity could decline to levels similar to those of the Maunder Minimum (Abreu et al., 2008; Lockwood et al., 2011; Anet et al., 2013), more recent solar observations suggest a different trajectory. In particular, sunspot number (SSN) records for Solar Cycle 25 already exceed those of Cycle 24, indicating that solar activity is currently increasing (SIDC – Solar Influences Data Analysis Center, 2024). As such, a Dalton-like or Gleissberg-type minimum is considered more plausible in the near future."

As a side note, the first reference in the article is from Valentina Zharkova who seems to be the main source in popular media claiming that there is an upcoming grand solar minimum. Some of their work also appears to be very climate-change-denial adjacent. There is a Live Science article rebutting Zharkova's grand solar minimum: [13]. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: Zharkova had a paper on this grand solar minimum retracted [14] (PubPeer link: [15]), and her past work has been highlighted not so positively in Science Alert [16] and [17], Slate [18], and Ars Technica [19]. From what I gather, this modern grand minimum is a climate change denial talking point. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 17:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge whatever is salvageable into Solar cycle 25 which already has a "Predictions" section where this will belong in case there are any peer-reviewed studies that still make such predictions. --hroest 15:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge per the above. --cyclopia ^speak! 10:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just delete Norlk (talk) 14:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 'Delete' and 'merge' are mutually exclusive. Either something can be salvaged, or it can't
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Albanian protests

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An ordinary protest without much lasting effects, probably fails WP:EVENT A1Cafel (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Albania. A1Cafel (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the article is now expanded and updated. Moondragon21 (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MMC Automotriz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Car manufacturing company that fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Half of the sources cited in this article come from company's own website, while others are very short mentions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Venezuela. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm not fully decided on the !vote, but there's quite some coverage in independent sources, especially about production issues, worker strikes, and a major acquisition operation [20][21][22][23][24][25]. Also covered in in a book about the Panama Papers [26] but I have not accessed it so not sure the extent of it. MarioGom (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Devdutta Manisha Baji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. I removed a ton of unsourced content but even what is left is just mentions and a lot of those are WP:NEWSORGINDIA. CNMall41 (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @CNMall41,
Firstly, thank you for reviewing the page. Every notice is a new learning experience for me, and I have carefully gone through your comments.
- Please forgive me if I have not used the correct Wikipedia technical terms. I usually use generic terminology to convey points, though I do try to follow Wikipedia guidelines as best as I can.
Regarding the Devdutta article: I won't claim he is notable without basis, and though I wrote the article, I’m not approaching it with bias. I would like to present a logical, reference-based defense for my work. Beyond that, you all are the experts, and I trust your decision.
Let me address the points one by one:
1. WP:NEWSORGINDIA
Since I don’t know the subject personally, I cannot confirm whether he or his production houses paid for the articles referenced. I used sources that I found available online. Therefore, I have no comment on their promotional nature. If you have any suggestions or tools to help identify whether a link is paid/promotional, that would be really helpful for my future articles.
2. Removal of Unsourced Data
Yes, he is also a singer. I found his name listed on the music apps I use, and also in Wikipedia film tables where he is credited for singing. However, I remember a previous admin mentioning that a Wikipedia article cannot be used as a reference for another Wikipedia article. So, I didn’t cite them. And since platforms like Spotify or JioSaavn are not accepted as references, I couldn’t use those either. Thank you for cleaning up the unsourced information. It would be great if you could guide me on how to properly cite chartbusters or music credits.
----
Defense Based on WP:NMUSICIAN
I’ve reviewed the WP:NMUSICIAN guidelines, and I believe the subject meets the criteria for notability for the following reasons:
a) WP:MUSICIAN - Point 2
This mentions having a single or album on a national chart. His song “Raja Ala” from Pawankhind was a chartbuster. I’m slightly confused because, in India, songs are mostly part of film soundtracks, unlike in Hollywood where albums and movies are more separate. Still, this subject has composed music for high-budget Marathi films, and several of his songs have been popular.
b) WP:MUSICIAN - Point 3
This point seems a bit biased, as it references RIAA certification and Yahoo Music ratings. Indian music directors typically aren't evaluated through such systems. How, then, can Indian subjects qualify under this criterion?
c) WP:MUSICIAN - Point 4
Again, this seems tilted toward Western norms. Indian music directors primarily work in film, and their recognition usually comes through movie soundtracks, not necessarily through concerts. Concerts are secondary.
d) WP:MUSICIAN - Point 5
I believe the subject qualifies here. His music albums have been released under Zee Music, a reputed label with over 10 years in the industry. Zee itself is a well-established brand.
e) WP:MUSICIAN - Awards (e.g., Grammy, Academy)
This also feels biased, as these awards are region-specific. In India, we have our own recognized awards like Filmfare and state-level honors such as Nandi Awards. The subject has received several regional awards and was also nominated for Filmfare Marathi, which I’ve mentioned in the article. Therefore, I believe he satisfies this condition too.
Finally, I’d like to share that I’m just a movie buff. With the rise of OTT platforms, language barriers have started to fade, and I’ve found myself exploring cinema beyond my native language. I initially began writing about Telugu movies, but then I found inspiration in my mentor and brother @Jayanthkumar123, who was actively contributing articles for Telugu cinema. Later, I saw @DareshMohan bro contributing valuable content for Kannada films.
That’s when I realized there’s a real need to work on communities like Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, and Bengaliwhere even native-language contributors are very few. I wanted to help bridge that gap and bring more visibility to regional cinema and artists who truly deserve recognition.
Regarding the issue of paid articles: it’s evident that well-established personalities or large production houses can easily pay to get featured in newspapers and portals—eventually leading to the creation of a Wikipedia article even before the film’s release.
On the other hand, subjects who lack financial resources and media exposure often have their pages deleted for “lack of citations.” This feels like an unfortunate imbalance, and I hope we can find fairer ways to address it.
My final input regarding this article is that the subject is notable. He has composed quality music and has several popular songs that have performed well on music apps within the Marathi industry. He is regarded as one of the top music directors in that space.
My suggestion would be to remove any unsourced content and improve the article in alignment with Wikipedia guidelines. Beyond that, I leave the final decision to the experienced editors—admins, rollbackers @Ab207, and others in the community hierarchy.
Thank you for this opportunity to learn and grow. Every review is a valuable learning experience for me. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 18:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kotaro Shimbara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not quite pass WP:SPORTCRIT and a cursory search did not yield anything useful. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kiyoshi Umegaki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not quite pass WP:SPORTCRIT and a cursory search did not yield anything useful. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cuisine of Antarctica

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically, Antarctica has no cuisine. There is food which has been used on expeditions (just like it was used on arctic expeditions, or by mountaineers). The very long "overview" section has nothing to do with the "cuisine of Antarctica" and seems like pure padding. At best, this article needs to be severely trimmed and moved to something like Food of Antarctic expeditions, without a redirect. Fram (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: as pointed out to me previously, WP:R#KEEP states that redirects from moves should usually not be deleted. Stockhausenfan (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That mostly applies to redirects with a longer history, not for page moves of new or very recent pages (there may be other reasons to keep such redirects anyway of course). Fram (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Antarctica. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fictional topic, there is no cuisine of Antarctica – pack animals having been eaten does not make it the local cuisine or suitable to be listed with other foods eaten. The Overview section is bafflingly irrelevant and a copy-paste of Wildlife of Antarctica. Food eaten on Antarctic expeditions is little different from that eaten on other sailing trips of the era or on Arctic expeditions – perhaps there's a place to mention these foodstuffs but certainly not a new standalone page for Antarctica. Reywas92^Talk 17:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definist fallacy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current topic is not independently notable and should just be discussed (if at all) in a paragraph or section of the Naturalistic fallacy article. ExplodingCabbage (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some further elaboration:

The article right now is solely about a hypothetical fallacy discussed in one journal article by Frankena, whose sole point is to critique Moore's account of the naturalistic fallacy, and does so by inventing a broader "fallacy" called the "definist fallacy" and then arguing that it is not a fallacy at all.

Most sources that use the term "definist fallacy" do so in an entirely different sense to Frankena's. If you look at the first page of Google results for "definist fallacy", then, besides Wikipedia and pages that copied from Wikipedia, you will mostly see pages that use the term to describe a fallacy that involves either:

unfairly defining a term in such a manner as to favour your side of an argument, or
arguing that a term must be rigorously defined before it can be used

neither of which relate to the current article topic.

Note also that the existing redirect from Socratic fallacy is incorrect. The Socratic Fallacy is synonymous with yet another entirely different and unrelated "definist fallacy", not Frankena's that our article is currently about nor either of the other two that I mention above.

Thus even though the term is fairly popular, usage of it is overwhelmingly not related to the current article topic, which I suspect is probably better thought of as a minor subtopic for the Naturalistic fallacy article.

(And in any case, the article as it currently exists is awful, so even if a case exists for the "fallacy" from Frankena's 1939 argument against Moore having its own dedicated article, nothing would really be lost by starting again from scratch.) ExplodingCabbage (talk) 16:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ClubHouze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article refers only to self-published and primary sources. I cannot find any independent sources with significant coverage. The organization seems to have had a facebook-page that has not been updated for quite a while. I do not see how or why this organization may be notable. Fails WP:GNG. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Australia. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Dance, Music, and Schools. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KK Korab

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any references about Korab University or its basketball team. Fails WP:GNG. See also WP:NTEAM. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and North Macedonia. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clashes in Brussels on May 4 and 5, 2025

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, racist and violent football-related riots which happen sadly quite often. Can perhaps be a short paragraph in some other article, don't know where though, but not enough to be a separate article. Got a lot of attention, as these things do, but no indication so far that this will lead to anything WP:SUSTAINED. Fram (talk) 15:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Discrimination, Football, and Belgium. Fram (talk) 15:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – the article does not describe just another hooligan riot, but a case of significant socio-political unrest in Belgium. 80 people were injured, including children, policemen and a man with serious gunshot wounds. this is very unusual. there have been many political reactions at national level and official commemorations. several foreign media have covered these events, including in France (RMC Sport, La Dépêche, So Foot), Spain (Diario AS) and the Netherlands (NOS), which demonstrates international notability of these events. the argument that we don't yet know whether this will have a lasting impact doesn't hold water, because the impact is already there, widely covered by reliable secondary sources. --GloBoy93 (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Somewhat ref-bombed, however I've read some of the French articles, this seems like a notable event. There are multiple issues with the article and its structure. The article needs renaming. WP:DMY needs applying correctly for Belgium. Other than issues to address, i'd say keep. Govvy (talk) 17:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Drake Passage earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:EVENT; this is an earthquake with no lasting impact or in-depth coverage unworthy of its own article. Has not caused serious impact or disruption. Some notable aspects of the article suitable for Wikipedia can be merged into List of earthquakes in 2025 as the list has dictated. An article is unnecessary Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree for similar reasons. Quake1234 (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Quake1234 you need to explicitly vote by adding a bolded Support/Oppose or Keep/Delete FYI Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Argentina, and Chile. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no enduring impact. Mikenorton (talk) 12:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Dora. Any arguments about strength amount to WP:TRIVIA at this stage. Borgenland (talk) 12:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Incoming WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments which has taken off recently in AfDs Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Merge a brief snippet to list 2025 earthquakes and redirect per nom.Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added some details to the notes section of the table entry for this quake at List of earthquakes in 2025. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This was a high-magnitude earthquake—the strongest in over 75 years in the area. It caused no damage but did lead to evacuations due to tsunami warnings. Many less significant earthquakes, especially in the United States, have their own Wikipedia pages. Pristino (talk) 01:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pristino, you've been on Wikipedia long enough to know that notability is based on the sourcing, not how important it feels or whether there are other articles that might also need to be deleted. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Case in point: 2018 Hawaii earthquake. It had a lower magnitude that this one (6.9 vs. 7.4) and occurred in an earthquake-prone area as well. No damage was reported. Not WP:WAX, because (1) there was talk of deleting the article, but no AfD was initiated, and (2) it has survived a full seven years on Wikipedia. Pristino (talk) 12:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to take the Hawaii article to AfD. Dawnseeker2000 16:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thebiguglyalien, here you have the source you are asking for: Montes, Carlos (May 2, 2025). «Magallanes registra el terremoto más fuerte en 75 años por activación de desconocida falla de Scotia». La Tercera. Consultado el 2 de mayo de 2025. It exist in the article and is used to state that what Pristino wrote here. Ingminatacam (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a WP:News article, not an encyclopedic subject. No significant secondary coverage. A merge is unnecessary as a single list entry on the target page is sufficient. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge – No impact from the earthquake. Bakhos Let's talk! 03:39, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:EVENT, no lasting effect.--Darius (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – this was a good candidate for WikiNews; it is not encyclopedic. Dawnseeker2000 16:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It had strong media coverage and much expectation in Chile (national level) and Argentina (provincial level) regarding a tsunami that was expected. It was felt and caused alarm in numerous settlements including the cities of Punta Arenas, Río Grande, Ushuaia and Puerto Williams. Various scientific enquiries on this unusual earthquake are underway. Ingminatacam (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Strongest earthquake in the area in the last 75 years [27]. I would say that's something. MarioGom (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "No secondary coverage", my aunt... There's solid coverage of characteristics and emergency response. I don't know where this idea comes from that earthquakes without a death toll are not notable. Have fun enshrining that in a guideline. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – No notable impact on people or structures from the shaking or tsunami, not especially scientifically notable, just occurred in a less common area. Others pointed out how it's the largest there in 75 years but that alone isn't enough to warrant its own article. Just another knee-jerk reaction of an article made shortly after the earthquake happened. MagikMan1337 (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plenty of coverage in sources clearly referenced in the article. --cyclopia ^speak! 10:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To quote from WP:EVENT, "Events that are only covered in sources published during or immediately after an event, without further analysis or discussion, are likely not suitable for an encyclopedia article". I'm not seeing anything significant published after the day of the earthquake. Mikenorton (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A single earthquake occurring in a less common area doesn't warrant its own page Agnieszka653 (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – robertsky (talk) 15:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grey Kanfield

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO. Coverage appears to be limited to an interview with band members and a piece mentioning when they left the band. (I did check under their birth name as well.) Would be best as a redirect to Vial (band), since all coverage is tightly tied to the band. — Moriwen (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Moriwen (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Krzak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG zero independent reliable sources and conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom Laura240406 (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Internet, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I searched EBSCO database and Google News; and found only passing mentions confirming his animation credits, but lacking SIGCOV. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 19:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Carlos Álvarez Valdés

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This young tennis player fails WP:GNG without significant coverage. The only secondary source I found is a routine announcement on Tribuna Mexico. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Mexico. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – "Highest ranking No. 842" – I think this speaks for itself regarding the notability of this tennis player. Svartner (talk) 18:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Total GNG flop. I cannot find anything like SIGCOV for this player. Anxioustoavoud (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Uchenna Emembolu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are not WP:RS and that renders this subject ineligible for an article Mekomo (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Wave Cave incident

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sad accident, but why do we have an article for it? Accidents happen all the time and routinely get reported upon directly after they happen, but are unlikely to have WP:SUSTAINED coverage or long-term impact. Fram (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Arizona. Fram (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are unfortunately too many deaths on public lands, which get deserved news coverage, but they certainly don't need standalone articles. Reywas92^Talk 15:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
maybe I could make a wave cave article and have this merged? JaxsonR (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We don't typically include events like this even on subject articles, they're unfortunately rather routine, and this occurred on the trail due to heat issues rather than anything intrinsic to the cave. Even if there were a sentence in an article, it wouldn't need to be merged from this page. I don't think the cave is notable enough for an article either though, seems to be a generic small formation and I don't see any dedicated reliable sources but it might be possible. Reywas92^Talk 19:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've added info to Gold Canyon, Arizona. Sorry but I'm going to remove this. It's tragic but doesn't have historical encyclopedic significance to this community – a lot of unexpected deaths are reported in the news, including heat stroke, but it's not something we include every incident of. 16 died at the Grand Canyon alone last year, more than 2100 across all parks over five years. There wouldn't be space for anything else if every "incident" like this were on towns' or trails' articles. Reywas92^Talk 19:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Đorđe Nešković

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Serbia. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Notability: Đorđe Nešković has led a national team at multiple European Curling Championships, which is a significant international competition. That's a point in favor of notability.
Achievement: He won Serbia's first ever curling medal at the 2013 European C-Group Championships. First national medals in any sport usually carry weight.

Боки 💬 📝 21:28, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of those criteria meet WP:NCURLING. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2013 European Curling Championships – Men's tournament#Group C where his name is mentioned. By the way, has anyone tried searching under "Ђорђе Нешковић"? Because that's where potential coverage would be. Following WP:NSPORTS2022, notability should be only judged by references provided on the article, not achievements anymore. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for clearer consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Norlk (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Douglas

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously closed as redirect but has been expanded. I don’t believe any of this goes beyond a failed political candidate who is not notable outside the election Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 14:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or re-redirect. The significant parts of the article are entirely about his political activities but do not pass WP:NPOL. I found this through the academics and educators deletion sorting list but there is clearly no alternative form of notability through his work as a substitute teacher. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Double Trouble (Odetari song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NSONG and a search for things like reviews and general reception yielded nothing useful. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Odetari: Song is not notable, but article on artist exists. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 15:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wojciech Papis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Niche Polish politician. Never held any office or won any election. He did declare himself as a candidate for a presidential election, but it's just a publicity stunt, with no serious coverage. No pl wiki interwiki, no sources in the article that meet WP:SIGCOV. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Poland. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I can even defend this article, haha. The only thing that it's useful for is Joanna Senyszyn having her Nonpartisans endorsement link here. Polish kurd (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for at least one keep/delete vote to appear
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Norlk (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete, mostly per nom. Can't read the non-english sourcing but it seems like there is not sigcov here based on translation. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karthika Vaidyanathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Been to draft twice but still not referenced. Refs are profiles and passing mentions. Fails WP:NSINGER, WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 06:52, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The singer has been awarded Best playback singer (Female): Karthika Vaidyanathan (Kangal Edho, Chithha). I have referenced articles talking about this. Eg: https://www.news18.com/movies/69th-filmfare-awards-south-a-complete-look-at-the-list-of-winners-8991955.html I believe it is unfair to call it "passing mentions". These are news articles that refer to the person winning the award. The Filmfare awards are as significant as the Oscars in India and hence, should not be thought of as a trivial thing.

These news articles validate that Karthika Vaidyanathan is a playback singer. The parts that are not referenced are her childhood and awards won before she went professional. These details can be deleted, as I could not find references to them (got this from a primary source).

I don't believe the points you've stated validate deletion of the page. I would request you to suggest omissions based on lack of references and not a complete deletion. Kgovindan27 (talk) 06:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kgovindan27: No. This is a WP:BLP. References need to be in-depth, independent and reliable. They need to be WP:SECONDARY. That example above is a classic example of a passing mention. There information there. Nothing. On WP:BLP it states "Wikipedia must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources". There is nothing here. If you WP:THREE secondary sources, post them up so they can be viewed and analysed to prove the person is notable. scope_creep^Talk 08:06, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per long established consensus having a single award makes you notable, but doesn't guarantee an article. It needs several good WP:SECONDARY to prove the person is notable. scope_creep^Talk 08:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

American Eagle Flight 5401

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been turned into a redirect multiple times by several editors (myself included back in 2019). Fails WP:SUSTAINED, and normally aviation incidents which result in zero fatalities are best served as redirects. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Puerto Rico. Shellwood (talk) 12:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - specifically to American Eagle (airline brand)#Accidents and incidents (where it was until recently) It's a run-of-the-mill incident; prop planes bounce down runways all the time, causing injuries, absent any sustained coverage or any claim in the article for notability this should be a redirect. JeffUK 12:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Striking for now, see discussion RE ongoing changes to procedures. JeffUK 10:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to American Eagle (airline brand)#Accidents and incidents as an alternative to deletion – Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENTCRIT – Per WP:GNG, "sources should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability". From what I've been able to find, none of the sources were secondary in nature since none of them contained analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the event itself. The event does not have significant, in-depth, nor sustained continued coverage of the event itself with coverage only briefly occurring in the aftermath of the accident. WP:EVENTCRIT#4 states that routine kinds of news events including most accidents – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance, which this event lacks. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I just added that the accident resulted in changes to procedures and regulations affecting airlines, and so has an lasting effect: The accident let to inclusion of "bounced landing recovery techniques" in pilot trainings. (Note to nominator rationale: It is not a good AFD reasoning: Has been turned into a redirect multiple times by several editors (myself included back in 2019) The article includedes now much more references, is improved and is in better shape compared to the previous time the nominator redirected the page.) 95.98.65.177 (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What proof is there that there were lasting effects? Just because recommendations were issued doesn't necessarily mean that they were ever implemented. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviationwikiflight:: Recommendations were as good as directly implemented: "On September 25, 2004, Executive Airlines incorporated bounced landing recovery techniques in its Airplane Operating Manual (AOM). The bounced landing recovery guidance states the following: In the event the aircraft should bounce after landing, hold or re-establish a normal landing attitude and immediately add power as necessary to control the rate of descent. When using this recovery technique, exercise extreme caution not to increase the pitch attitude above normal as this will only increase the height of the bounce and may cause entry into stall warning. DO NOT push over, as this will only cause another bounce and damage the nose gear. If there is any doubt as to a safe recovery, the captain will call for and conduct an immediate go-around. Apply go-around power and fly the Missed Approach/Rejected Landing Profile. DO NOT retract the Landing Gear until a positive rate of climb is established because a second touchdown may occur during the recovery. ". Next to that, when I Google it, I see the topic reached a lot of attentention in pilot training now, 2 pages I opened for instance pilotmall and pilotinstitute. 95.98.65.177 (talk) 14:01, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have a source that says this incident lead to the inclusion of bounced landing recovery techniques even in the EA manual (The source in the article mentions both things, but does not say it was causally linked)? If it was just one airline implementing them, rather than a change to national regulations or guidance I still don't think that's enough; the source also says that some airlines and manufacturers already had bounced landing techniques in their training programmes.

If the FAA did in fact "Require all 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 and 135 air carriers to incorporate bounced landing recovery techniques in their flight manuals and to teach these techniques during initial and recurrent training. (A-05-30)" (as recommended by the report for this accident).. AND did so as a direct result of this incident, (Not, for instance, because there were hundreds of similar incidents with similar recommendations) then that changes things. JeffUK 10:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/11/12/2013-26845/qualification-service-and-use-of-crewmembers-and-aircraft-dispatchers comes close. "The FAA determined that training on recovery from bounced landing is necessary based on FAA review of accident history including.." the mentions two incidents, including flight 5401. I think that does merit inclusion in the article. "This is one of the accidents that caused bounced training landing to become mandatory" does make this feel more notable... JeffUK 10:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See for the main source page numbered as 28 of the Aircraft Accident Report. (From this date other airliners copied related phrasing to their manuals, however without referring to this accident; and also not to another accident.) 95.98.65.177 (talk) 23:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My point is, we have evidence that one airliner changed its procedure due to this specific accident, with the other airliners following with related phrasings. And, as I’m aware of, all airliners incorporated bounced landing recovery techniques. Such changes/additions are (of course) not explained; but the fact is the airliners incorporated it after this high-impact bounced landing recovery techniques accident. This makes it highly likely that the awareness of bounced landing recovery techniques after this specific accident caused a lasting effect. 95.98.65.177 (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage needed to establish notability is still pretty lackluster. I don't see why this couldn't be covered at American Eagle (airline brand)#Accidents and incidents or also Bounced landing and maybe add a few lines or more on what happened following the release of the final report. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The page needs more references. And, also this week I have had two articles that I originated and had been sent to redirect reappear as main space articles, this one and the Sergio Blass one. I wonder how that happens? It was not me!!! (lol) Jeanette the dancer Martin {*wink*) 10:22, 9 April, 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle (airline brand)#Accidents and incidents per WP:ATD. The only linked sources are two local articles from around the same day as the accident with only very basic levels of coverage (WP:NOTNEWS), plus the accident report itself (which I don't think actually qualifies as a "secondary source", it is more of a "primary source" as per Aviationwikiflight). As such, I do not think that WP:NEVENT is passed. Flip^and Flopped ツ 01:51, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As discussed in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 May 2, this AfD is reopened and relisted following a "redirect" closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. In June 2023 I came across this article and saw that it had been redirected without any apparent consensus to do so and restored the article. I then worked on adding to the article to help establish evidence of meeting WP:GNG. After a thirty minute search, having made a determined effort, I found no reliable, independent sources aside from the day-of-the-event reporting. At that point, I concluded that I could not demonstrate GNG and ended up undoing my restoration of the article with the edit summary "Almost no coverage". The accident report and the federal register documents can't be used to meet GNG. RecycledPixels (talk) 15:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Serhat Albayrak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill businessman. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 13:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Turkey. Shellwood (talk) 14:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nasimi (Baku Metro)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems unlikely that sources exist which show that every stop on this metro line are notable per WP:STATION. Other language WP pages are poorly referenced, at best they show the station exists in public timetables etc. WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LDC Publishers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent refs on the page. Nothing much found to consider against the notability criteria for inclusion JMWt (talk) 13:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 13:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robertas Lozinskis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially notable pianist. No social media, no streaming. Fails WP:MUSICBIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 13:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Lithuania. Shellwood (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find articles about performances given, such as Source 7 now in the article. Those aren't enough to show notability. An interview is about all I find. Not enough sourcing for an article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, confirms what I found. Lots of performance information, tickets and so on. scope_creep^Talk 18:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzz Academy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find a lick of reliable secondary coverage apart from a one sentence in an NPR profile of the creator, a successful author. I've added mention to the creator's biography based on that source. This can go. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Marie Lu, where nom added a cited mention. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think this page should be deleted. The creator’s Deviant Art Account has information about the site, under the username “mree”. There is little record of Fuzz Academy beyond their art uploads and commentary about the game in their posts. One day there may be even less record of it’s existence, save for a little stubby Wikipedia article - but at least it won’t become entirely lost media. Some of us still hold these forgotten, defunct games in our hearts, and to lose record of their existence is a saddening thought. 173.184.50.33 (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Was briefly active a decade ago, then nothing mentioned since. A reddit sub and some trademark registrations are about all I pull up, nothing notable about the website. Oaktree b (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Afshani

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination. I declined the speedy tag this am, since the (dated) sources all date newer than the previous AfD (inappropriately closed as speedy delete by a non-admin closer). This latest incarnation is entirely sourced from Farsi outlets, so even with translation, I'm not comfortable with my own views on how direct the detailing is or how much is merely routine entertainment chatter. BusterD (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Iran. BusterD (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: third relist in hopes of generating some discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Darna (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm failing to find any in-depth coverage in WP:RS to meet WP:GNG. While they may meet point 5 of WP:BAND, a) I'm not finding any sources to support this and b) the record label in question is entirely unsourced as well. The best I've found is this passing mention in a bio about one of its former members. I would have PRODed this but it was previously had a PROD removed in 2008 (although seemingly without solving the underlying problems). While there may be sources in Spanish that I'm missing, the .es version was also deleted in 2023. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 12:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Spain. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 12:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't add much to the nominator's investigation. This band is occasionally mentioned as an early stop for some members who went on to more notable things, but Darna themselves never achieved any significiant and dedicated media coverage that I can find. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:11, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of villages in Missouri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already merged with "List of Municipalities in Missouri". Notaoffensivename (talk) 02:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists, United States of America, and Missouri. Notaoffensivename (talk) 02:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: For legal reasons, mergers are almost never reasons to delete due to the need to retain attributions. Even at that, a {{Being merged}} tag was removed from this list last year by Nythar (talk · contribs) sayingno such consensus exists (in reference to the proposed merger). (For what it's worth, a similar tag was not removed from the list of cities in Missouri, which the nominator has also proposed to delete.) It would not surprise me if this nomination ends up not leading to anything, but at this time have little opinion beyond that. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perfectly valid navigational list, and the merge target is the worst article of the three proposed. SportingFlyer T·C 07:35, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Villages are by no means so different that they should be listed separately from the list of all municipalities. This is purely redundant and serves no purpose, List of municipalities in Missouri provides the exact same navigation but with data that isn't just bulleted blue links. You should merge the lead info as well. Reywas92^Talk 15:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Category:Lists of villages in the United States and Category:Lists of villages by country These seem to be accepted lists used by country and others. This seems to be global category listings. And as usual with Wikipedia, different styles for different places.— Maile (talk) 00:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- No, only a few other states have village lists, and in cases like List of villages in Massachusetts, the villages are not incorporated so they must be listed separately from actual municipalities, or in Guam, they are all of the municipalities and this is the only list for it. Several others in the category are the primary municipality list where the villages are included, just like List of municipalities in Missouri! In Missouri, villages are incorporated municipalities that are already listed in the main list, and there is nothing special about them that justifies a duplicate listing. Villages in other countries are obviously going to be too different to compare, but the style for Missouri should be to list the incorporated places together, without pointless redundancy. The fact that village lists are accepted elsewhere has no bearing on this page. Reywas92^Talk 01:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ingaigwanak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. No indication of significance. Refs are duds. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep^Talk 12:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tanzania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Gnodde

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person's bio is not notable as BLP. Could be BLARed and redirected to Goldman Sachs but I suggest discussing its notability here. The page is more about what the GoldmanSacks did not Mr. Gnodde NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 12:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NOTADVERT, This reads like an online business card. We know his career titles and promotions. But there is nothing here about how he achieved any of that. Even the Personal Life section is about his alleged personal wealth, and his intended relocation to Italy for tax purposes. — Maile (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WJNK-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD; questionable sourcing; some original research; tone concerns. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Tennessee. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to WPGD-TV History before Edge Spectrum came in and switched networks from 3ABN to TBN is unremarkable, and whatever their actual plans outside rebroadcasting WPGD-TV on ATSC 3.0 is a big unknown just because we have no idea what Edge Spectrum plans for their stations when they actually build them out or acquire one. Right now it's a pointless in-market translator for a network overcovered by WPGD and streaming...and it's not even broadcasting any of the networks in HD, even though the standard would allow that and they have nothing else outside these channels on their spectrum (this is why I AfD'ed their article, because I'm baffled about everything Edge Spectrum does). Nathannah • 📮 21:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hubertus Prinz von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is primarily about his parents and grandfather and very little about Hubertus himself beyond genealogical information. I see no reason for notability independent of his ancestry. WP:NOTINHERITED WP:NOTGENEOLOGY D1551D3N7 (talk) 10:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Royalty and nobility, and Germany. D1551D3N7 (talk) 10:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Ernst Leopold Prinz von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha (his father). The contents of this entire article can be transferred to and summed up in the "Marriage and family" section of the other article I mentioned. Vida0007 (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect per User:Vida0007. Kakurokuna (talk) 20:56, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.The present prospective petitioner to be restored as Duke of Albany should have his own article and Wikipedia's genealogical content is not a drawback in any sense and there is no reason to thin it just because it's not marked for extension.72.80.84.163 (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a form WP:CRYSTALBALL argument you are making. The Duke of Albany title was ended in the Titles Deprivation Act 1917 a whole 44 years before Hubertus was born. You seem to think there's some inherit notability in being "in line" for a title that fundamentally no longer exists and your basis is that it could potentially be restored but there's no sources to support that. D1551D3N7 (talk) 17:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Royal Family article in Debrett's Peerage includes the deprived titles as "suspended" and tracks the heirs and we should do likewise...the law makes provision for heirs to petition to be restored. 72.80.84.163 (talk) 04:12, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Beeing a potential petitoner does not bring relevance. Beeing a petitoner would change that, but this is WP:CRYSTALBALL. Keeping track of who reliabable sources think could be a potential petioner is already covered in the article Duke of Albany, which is the appropriate place. --Theoreticalmawi (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The terms of the Act make clear who the one person at any time entitled to petition is but the deletion of this article might be seen as an excuse to omit mention of it from the Duke of Albany article.72.80.84.163 (talk) 15:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 17:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only claim to fame is nobility. Germany abolished its princely houses over a century ago; those who can trace their lineage back to someone who was once a prince are not princes, and have no nobility to inherit (and in any case, Wikipedia doesn't do notability-by-inheritance). The title Duke of Albany was also abolished more than a century ago. The original abolition allowed for a petition to have it reinstated, but no one has ever done so. In fact no one, in the last century, has ever petitioned for the restoration of any of the titles abolished back in 1917. They are gone. This whole article is unnecessary royal-cruft based on a single source and a fantasy that someone might be restored to something that doesn't exist. Once all this is stripped out, we're left with a guy with 5 half-siblings, an ex and a kid, who manages some property. That's not enough for notability. Elemimele (talk) 13:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asteria Aerospace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:CORPTRIV. References are routine business news. scope_creep^Talk 18:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Aviation, and Karnataka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative Keep Delete, Having searched for Asteria Aerospace I have found a few articles spread over a range of different times that provide coverage with it as the main or a significant focus of the coverage, and so appear to provide notability. I would appreciate if someone else would take a look though, especially to verify that the sources are reliable, which they seem to be on a surface level.

The following is just a list to those articles if you want to take a look:

Asteria Aerospace receives DGCA type certification for its A200-XT drone, Published/last edited 16 Jan 2023
Asteria Aerospace launches drone software platform SkyDeck, Published/last edited 23 Mar 2022
Asteria Aerospace Enhances Indian Army's Eyes

Emily.Owl (talk) 15:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of these press release based. Routine annoucements that fail WP:CORPTRIV and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 15:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, when you had said routine business news I had thought more along the lines of announcements about leadership, goals, fundraising, etc.

But if that is routine (which it probably is) then yeah it probably does fail for sufficient notability. Emily.Owl (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Katy Perry: Night of a Lifetime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced and lacks notability. Should be merged into the 143 album article. Sricsi (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Television. Sricsi (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and lack of sources online. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What are you supporting? A merger? Geschichte (talk) 17:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hopepunk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly a neologism, not notable enough for its own article. Instead, move the content to wiktionary. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 12:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, of course it is a neologism, but how that could be a criteria for deletion? What's needed is enough reliable sources to support it, not if it's a word and concept created only a few years ago. You can't argue it's not notable without giving any reason. Is it supported by sources? Yes. Are there enough reliable sources? Maybe that can be discussed, even if I doubt that peer-reviewed articles written by scholars in litterature, and articles published in prominent media such as The Guardian, Wired or The Wall Street Journal can be considered not reliable and not notable enough. El Comandante (talk) 14:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per criterion 3 (no accurate deletion rationale). There's plenty of SIGCOV in the article right now. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 16:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (article creator !vote) WP:NEO states:"To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources say about the term or concept, not just sources that use the term". The following independent reliable sources cited in the article write about hopepunk: Vox (2018); Repeller (2019); Reactor (2020);ProQuest 2190465513 Wall Street Journal (2019); Hope Matters: Why Changing the Way We Think Is Critical to Solving the Environmental Crisis (2020);ProQuest 2312682137 Den of Geek (2019);Gale A781561171 Writing Magazine (2024); America: the Jesuit Review (2019);ProQuest 2314175414 CE Noticias Financieras (2019);Gale A791659538 International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (2024). I included the publication years in the list to show that coverage also meets WP:SUSTAINED. Schazjmd (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources presented by Schazjmd, and available thru GScholar, e.g. [28]. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khatib Mwashetani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 12:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: appears to have been named to a ministerial position (?), I'm not sure how politics in the country works. [29], [30], should pass notability as a member of parliament. Oaktree b (talk) 12:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Kenya. Shellwood (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dharavi metro station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sources to show that this meets WP:GNG. There does seems to be a slideshow of photos of the metro station though. Recommend converting it into a redirect to Line 3 (Mumbai Metro). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, India, and Maharashtra. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draft leaving a redirect to Line 3 (Mumbai Metro) If the article is moved to draft, the editor who created it can still work on it. He/she is an inexperienced editor, whose account was created a year ago. He/she has only recently experimented with trying to create new articles. Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers applies.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dadar Metro metro station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sources to show that this meets WP:GNG. There does seems to be a slideshow of photos of the metro station though. Recommend converting it into a redirect to Line 3 (Mumbai Metro). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, India, and Maharashtra. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draft leaving a redirect to Line 3 (Mumbai Metro) Clicking the Google News link above showed 56 useful sources. You have to get special permission to cite swarajyamag.com in articles (because it has published misinformation a lot), but V Bhagya Subhashini's 14 May 2024 article South Mumbai Welcomes Metro: Successful Trial Run On City’s First Underground Corridor is worth reading, and does more than mention Dadar in passing. If the article-creator could find five or six articles like that one (but from less controversial sources), it would prove notability.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The only phrase in the first result of "South+Mumbai+Welcomes+Metro" which has more than a passing ref to the metro station is "Dadar and Siddhivinayak stations are poised to open for commuters upon the completion of Phase II". IMO that is far from SIGCOV. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hokkaido Kaminokuni High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Upon search, the school does not seem to have reliable, secondary coverage. There is no real reason to presume the school is notable per WP:NSCHOOL or WP:GNG. Was PROD'd by @Alphabetagamma in August '24 but contested. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Balochistan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At the time, WP:TOOSOON, fails to retain a stand-alone article on this encyclopedia as it is clearly out from the scope of WP:GNG being devoid of any WP:RS and independent sources, has merely a few as well as unreliable news sources coming from the Indian news media. MŠLQr (talk) 11:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Pakistan. MŠLQr (talk) 11:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: Similar case for another associated article (Balochistan Freedom Declaration) currently under the AfD. MŠLQr (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete pr nomination. No independent or reliable sources supporting this article...Ngrewal1 (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very much TOOSOON. This might fizzle away in 6mths; it's only been declared in the last week. We need to see if this turns out to be important, hence the TOOSOON. Oaktree b (talk) 14:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balochistan Freedom Declaration. MarioGom (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unicar Cesena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proven notability. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 11:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 12:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For anyone looking for sources, keep in mind that this team went by various names besides Unicar (e.g. Conad, Ahena). MarioGom (talk) 19:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xait

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After removing press releases and SYNTH, there's really not much here. Checking for sources doesn't show me anything that meets WP:NCORP, although it's possible there are some non-English sources that I didn't find in my search. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eddy, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topos show this to a be the location of a passing siding, which is confirmed by old tax records, but there's no indication of a town here, and the county history I found only mentions people named Eddy. Mangoe (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 12:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no indication of a town here. just a post office. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 17:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 India-Pakistan conflict ceasefire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an undiscussed and largely redundant fork of 2025 India–Pakistan conflict#Ceasefire. The "Global Reactions" section is a WP:QUOTEFARM consisting of generic quotes that hardly adds anything to the article. There isn't enough substantial additional content here to warrant a separate article. 9ninety (talk) 10:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, Pakistan, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no need for this fork apart from all the other forks Soni (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2025 India–Pakistan conflict#Ceasefire: no reason to have this as a separate, and largely duplicative, article. Redirect to the relevant section in the main article. SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.64.207 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:GNG. We also have Tashkent Declaration which concerns Indo-Pakistani war of 1965. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 14:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Passing GNG doesn't absolve it of WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Tashkent Declaration can hardly be compared based on quality, and the fact that it ended a major war compared to a minor four-day conflict. 9ninety (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MergeVeritasphere (talk) 15:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Big enough thus merging won't work. The subject has enough international coverage to warrant an article. Orientls (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It may be "big enough", but the content itself is problematic, as it is largely a fork of 2025 India–Pakistan conflict#Ceasefire (which actually contains way more information). Half the article is a background section and a reactions section that is also problematic for being a messy quotefarm.merging won't work There isn't really anything to even merge looking at the section already in the original article. This is a pure content fork. 9ninety (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:RAPID. It will be decided later whether it still deserves standalone article or not, but for now it is notable given the large numbers of international outlets significantly talking about it. Shankargb (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bule Hora University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs are all database sites. BEFORE turned up one short news article on protests at the university. Article would be a stub if not for filler like "teaches normal subjects", "has a campus", "has an online portal", "is top 30 in Ethiopia" (ranked #27/35?) REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 09:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Ethiopia. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 09:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears notable enough Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elsie Lovelock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with no independent sources that I can find. The only significant role of this voice actress is in SMG4, a web series. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Should be able to find plenty of sources Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now would be the time to do so, if you wish to see the article be kept. It's not enough to just baselessly state that "sources must exist" somewhere out there. Sergecross73 msg me 10:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not locate enough reliable sources to establish notability. The only other source I found was a brief quote in an IGN article about AI. Esw01407 (talk) 12:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Theatre, Video games, Comics and animation, Anime and manga, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Totally unreferenced stub with list of unreferenced WP:MILL credits. Nothing would be lost by deleting this. If anyone ever finds any significant coverage of this person, they will be able to write a much better article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Halbauer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet SIGCOV. I can only find passing and routine mentions of this tennis player who appears to have spent most, if not all, of her career playing low level events with limited success. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Tennis, and United States of America. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 08:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Don't think she passes sport specific notability guidelines, as her entry in Charleston was part of a wildcard pair. I had a dig through her WTA match record and did not notice any top level matches for which she either got in directly or via qualifying. Leonstojka (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Barbara Micarelli School

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG due to the absence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, lack of citations, and directory-only content. Scoria (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Philippines. Scoria (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely any notability whatsoever. All the sources are either primary sources or logs of schools. It seems like the article creator is related to the school, which makes the article less notable. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Deletion is totally unnecessary Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ulysses Paxton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Only a major character in a single novel, The Master Mind of Mars. A redirect to the novel (by someone else) was reverted, so here we are. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Main character of a novel in a major SF series, and unlike most main characters in that series gets call-backs in at least two of the other novels. BPK (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Master Mind of Mars - A major character in only a single novel, whose role in the plot is already fully covered in the main article on that book. There are no sources, either included in this article or found upon searching, that covers the character in any extent beyond simply recapping the plot of The Master Mind of Mars, so there is no justification for WP:SPLITing this out into a separate article. Rorshacma (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a separate Burroughs character who interacts with others in more than one novel. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I mean, that's not even true based on the information provided in this article - he is mentioned in two other books, but does not actually have any involvement in the plots of either of them or interact with any of the characters in them. Rorshacma (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paxton's character narrates a second novel. Narration is not interacting but defines background and plot. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Bribes in History

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed for deletion with "WP:SYNTH, no evidence that these are the largest bribes in history or are generally considered as such.". Prod removed because " Deletion contested, not an uncontroversial proposal", which isn't really helpful as an explanation. Original Prod reason still applies. Fram (talk) 07:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, History, and Lists. Fram (talk) 07:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think this could be a useful topic, could be handled in an appropriate way for an encyclopaedia, as a useful extension of the article on bribery. But the current article isn't going about things correctly. There need to be criteria to define what constitutes a "largest bribe". I'd suggest returning to draft and either converting to a navigational list with a lot more entries, or if it's to be an informational list, basing it on sources that discuss large acts of bribery as a group. What it can't be, is a cherry-picked list of a handful of bribes that one or two editors happen to have found (and that's what it looks like in its current form). Elemimele (talk) 09:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There are severe issues with the article such as WP:SYNTH. I couldn't find if it is notable enough. THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 11:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Quan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about one recurring sketch on a local television show that has demonstrated zero notability twelve full years after being tagged for notability concerns. Literally Satan (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Television, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Almost Live! No sources help the article out so I suggest redirecting this sketch to the show it appeared in Scooby453w (talk) 12:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: to the TV show seems fine. Over a decade with no improvement, for a tv show from over 20 yrs ago. Oaktree b (talk) 14:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nagykörút (periodical)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a weird article about a newspaper nobody knows. --Altenmann >talk 07:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Hungary. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seemingly only came out once. Geschichte (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gauteng Women's Development League

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An under 16 football competition. Most of the sources and google news hits are from its broadcaster Supersport Schools. Fails GNG. Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Gauteng U/14 Women's Development League and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Gauteng U/16 Women's Development League. LibStar (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Football, and South Africa. LibStar (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Babli Kumari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The given sources are in non reputed media and also not independent. No other online coverage to satisfy notability. Being selected for DSP could be big personal milestone but does not ensures notability. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Police, India, and Bihar. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep,all news channels are reputed especially Firstpost Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 10:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not everyone clears it while facing the conditions that she did Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David Kuykendall Stadium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing against the article but it looks to clearly fail WP:GNG. It has virtually no secondary source coverage aside from passing mentions in (mostly local) news articles related to a recent news event, and in those articles it is generally only mentioned once and completely in passing. The article appears to have been created as a POV fork over BLP issues in Killing of Austin Metcalf. I suggest either a merge into Memorial High School (Frisco, Texas) or, because it is written mostly from primary sources, a redirection. Symphony Regalia (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I think it passes WP:NGEO. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I almost forgot to say, there is significant coverage about this stadium in these sources: [31],[32],[33]. I'm sure other sources can be found in the future. This nomination feels like a revenge on me for not letting him remove a paragraph in the Killing of Austin Metcalf. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 10:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first source fails WP:GNG's "Independent of the subject" clause, the second is self-published, and the third is local. Symphony Regalia (talk) 13:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per comments of WhoIsCentreLeft Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football, Softball, Sport of athletics, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep the only sourcing here is local, but I think there may be just enough to keep. There's also a potential easy argument for deletion too that it's just a routine high school football stadium, the sourcing is really weak (self published apart from the Dallas Morning News). I also think mentioning the killing is almost completely WP:UNDUE for this article and doesn't help notability of the stadium. SportingFlyer T·C 11:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Frisco Independent School District as possible search term. Giant Snowman 17:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of Ninh Bình

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fundamentally based on 19th-century French colonial primary sources with no verification from independent or Vietnamese historical accounts. A thorough search finds no mention of the “Capture of Ninh Binh” in Vietnamese historiography or modern reliable sources. The article therefore relies entirely on colonial-era narratives, which are highly prone to bias, exaggeration, and imperialist framing, one look at the article and you’ll understand. Per WP:V, WP:HISTRS, and WP:NPOV historical topics must be supported by reputable, secondary sources and not solely colonial accounts. Without independent corroboration, this article promotes a one-sided, questionable version of history that does not meet Wikipedia’s sourcing or notability standards. Therefore, deletion is the appropriate course. More detailed historical issues are explained further on the article’s Talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by OutsidersInsight (talk • contribs) 12:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC) .[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Vietnam, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is fully sourced. No issue with French colonial sources. Colonial-era narratives are reliable sources. The sources used are not primary, and independent corroboration is not required for WP:GNG. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It relies almost entirely on French colonial-era sources from the 1870s–1880s (Romanet du Caillaud, Charton, d’Estampes, Société académique indochinoise). Only two modern sources (Phạm 1985 and Short 2014) are cited, and neither independently corroborates the extraordinary claim (7 men capturing 1,700 soldiers). Per WP:HISTRS and WP:RS, such extraordinary historical claims require strong independent confirmation, which is missing here. Article currently gives a misleading sense of undisputed fact. OutsidersInsight (talk) 09:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but severely trim of Gulliver's adventures and epic poetry: "When the mist and darkness dissipated in the morning, the French could see several hundreds of soldiers looking at them on the walls" Really? --Altenmann >talk 07:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Garnier Expedition#Capture_of_Ninh_Bình from which this appears to have been copied. I'm not seeing why this needs to be taken out of that context other than to simply generate a higher article count, and issues about sourcing need to be dealt with there in any case. Mangoe (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paula Kruger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:JOURNALIST. Pizza on Pineapple ^{(Let's eat🍕)} 05:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and News media. Pizza on Pineapple ^{(Let's eat🍕)} 05:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Radio, Television, Internet, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there - I'm curious to know on what grounds you think this page is worthy of deletion - this is someone who has decades of relevant experience ARealWorm (talk) 06:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm curious to know why you don't think this person is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia- they have decades worth of relevant experience and engagement in the Australian industry and are now head of the Media Diversity Australia ARealWorm (talk) 06:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not meeting notability due to a lack of independent sourcing Oaktree b (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Source 5 is the only independent sourcing about this person. I don't find any other articles that could be used for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I think it's close. I agree that source 5 is the best source, and it's an article largely focused on the subject that was published in one of Australia's newspapers of record. But source 4 is also independent, significant coverage in a very reputable newspaper. I think you could easily make the case that those two sources are sufficient to meet WP:GNG. But both are very similar routine staffing announcements (one says she is joining ABC Radio Canberra, the other says she is now leaving), and feature a very high volume of quotes. I could be persuaded otherwise, but I don't think I really see the necessary depth in those two sources to demonstrate notability. MCE89 (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments - however there are more sources there now - please review ARealWorm (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look like any edits have been made to the article since I left my comment here. What additional sources are you referring to? MCE89 (talk) 02:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Totally unharmful to have an article Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RS:X Youth World Championships

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list of championships includes only 13 events, none of which have their own Wikipedia article. This leads me to believe the page may violate notability guidelines. I think it should be merged back into the main article, as it doesn't meet the criteria for a standalone page. However, given the heavy reliance on primary sources, there may be little, if any, content worth merging. Johnson524 06:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sports. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how you can ever reach that conclusion. It is a World Championship formally recognised by the IOC recognised sporting body. To add to this it is the "Youth" World Championship on the same equipment as used in the Olympic Games hence a number of high profile sailors. All the content for this has been on wikipedia for a number of years in templates. As per a previously agreed policy with other editors who requested that the events side is not on the same page as the equipment these event pages for each title were created. The title definately meets the sports notability requirement although I doubt individual event do. I will work more on the referencing but even this is much better than the previous 10 years. I would say this page also demostrates the usefullness of wikipedia as the official website for the RS:X disappeared within 18 months of the equipment not being used as Olympic equipment. The event is no longer held. Yachty4000 (talk) 01:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Yi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little established notability; sparse amount of sources available online or offline while article used to have iMDb as most sources. Subject edited own article, which has not been properly maintained to denote his significance and notability to be kept as an article. MimirIsSmart (talk) 06:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Hong Kong. MimirIsSmart (talk) 06:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:
Sources
1. Ng, Hung 吳雄 (2015-07-14). "中學念本地左校黃浩義香港經歷文革" [Attended Local Leftist School in Secondary School: Wong Ho-yee Experienced Cultural Revolution in Hong Kong]. Hong Kong Economic Journal (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2025-05-04. Retrieved 2025-05-04.
  The article notes: "香港「舞台劇之父」黃浩義長居上海，偶而回港為這片鄉土澆上一瓢清泉，其中一瓢是2013年8月拍成的電影《紅色的迴廊》（Red Passage）。奈何劇本早在2009年已寫好，先遇上資金、取景的困難，後遇上政治熱帶氣旋帶來的狂風暴雨，至今未有發行商願意放映。 ... 片中男主角從官校轉到左校，他就是黃浩義本人。... 結果，黃浩義去另一地方拍英國旗再把畫面合併。雖然拍攝在暑假進行，但傳媒竟找上門拜訪他。... 政治改變思想，思想改變命運，黃浩義中三就轉校，開涼茶舖的父親總算及時轉軚，才有了今天的舞台劇之父。"
  From Google Translate: "Hong Kong's 'Father of Stage Play' Wong Ho Yi has lived in Shanghai for a long time. He occasionally returns to Hong Kong to bring some fresh air to his hometown. One of his contributions was the movie 'Red Passage' which was made in August 2013. Unfortunately, the script was written as early as 2009, but it first encountered difficulties in funding and location selection, and then encountered the storm brought by the political tropical cyclone. So far, no distributor is willing to screen it. ... The protagonist in the film transferred from the official school to the left school, and he was Wong Ho Yi himself. ... As a result, Wong Ho Yi went to another place to take pictures of the British flag and then merged the images. Although the filming took place during the summer vacation, the media came to visit him. ... Politics changes thoughts, thoughts change destiny. Wong Ho Yi changed schools in Form 3, and his father, who ran a herbal tea shop, finally changed his mind in time, and he became the father of stage plays today."
2. Dong, Jin 董進 (2013-04-28). "香港舞台劇之父開創無厘頭風格后被周星馳借鑒" [Father of Hong Kong Stage Drama Pioneered Absurdist Style, Later Borrowed by Stephen Chow]. Chongqing Morning Post (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2016-11-10. Retrieved 2025-05-04 – via People's Daily.
  The article notes: "黃浩義1983年在港創辦香港青年劇團，成為第一代專業搞戲劇的。... 作為導演，黃浩義執導了不少優秀的舞台劇，而作為演員，黃浩義除了參演眾多港台劇，還在多部好萊塢電影中擔任角色，與布拉德·彼特(《間諜游戲》)、皮爾斯·布魯斯南（《007之擇日而亡》）都對過戲。聊起在好萊塢拍戲經歷，黃浩義很有感觸。"
  From Google Translate: "Wong founded the Hong Kong Youth Theater Company in Hong Kong in 1983, becoming the first generation of professional theater practitioners. ... As a director, Wong has directed many outstanding stage plays, and as an actor, Wong has appeared in many Hong Kong and Taiwan dramas, and has also played roles in several Hollywood films, starring with Brad Pitt ("Spy Game") and Pierce Brosnan ("007's Death"). When he talked about his experience of filming in Hollywood, Wong was very touched."
3. Sek, Kei 石琪 (2019-11-17). "粗口和紅色迴廊" [Profanity and the Red Corridor]. Ming Pao (in Chinese). p. S5.
  The article notes: "大家於是提及香港劇場，卅多年前最早把粗口引進「大雅之堂」，開路先鋒是黃浩義，一九八六年把美國著名粗口劇《美國水牛》翻譯演出，改名《鉤心鬥角》，台上猛講粵語粗口，大受青年學生歡迎，紛紛起哄，創下場場數特多的紀錄。... 黃浩義在香港劇壇的創舉不少，移居英國及上海也在演藝界創造一些先例。其實二○一四年他自編自導了一部很特別的香港獨立片《紅色的迴廊》，以他本身的少年經歷，描述七十年代初一個男生，因父親愛國，送他入香港左派中學，該校追隨大陸文革作風，念《毛語錄》，忠字舞，批批跳鬥，很「恐怖」。"
  From Google Translate: "Everyone then mentioned Hong Kong theatre, which was the first to introduce swear words into the "classical arena" more than 30 years ago. The pioneer was Wong Ho Yi, who translated and performed the famous American swear play "American Buffalo" in 1986, renamed it "Intrigue", and used Cantonese swear words on stage, which was very popular among young students. They all cheered and set a record for the number of performances. ... Wong Hoyi has made many innovations in the Hong Kong theatre scene, and his move to the UK and Shanghai also created some precedents in the entertainment industry. In fact, in 2014, he wrote and directed a very special Hong Kong independent film "Red Corridor", which was based on his own teenage experience and described a boy in the early 1970s who was sent to a leftist middle school in Hong Kong because of his patriotic father. The school followed the style of the Cultural Revolution in mainland China, reading "Quotations from Chairman Mao", doing the loyalty dance, and dancing criticisms. It was very "scary"."
4. Sek, Kei 石琪 (2014-11-15). "入讀左校的日子" [The Days of Enrolling in the Leftist School]. Ming Pao (in Chinese). p. D5.
  The article notes: "在「香港亞洲影展」看了黃浩義自編自導自製新片《紅色的迴廊》。黃浩義是本港資深話劇人，最具爭議性是廿多年前自導自演《勾心鬥角》，即美國著名粗口劇《美國水牛》的粵語版，大講粵語粗口，多次重演都滿座，成為本港舞台爆粗的先驅。隨後他的獨立電影《雷雨》改編曹禺名劇，涉及性問題也有爭議，但票房失利。"
  From Google Translate: "I watched the new film "Red Corridor" written, directed and produced by Wong Hoyi at the "Hong Kong Asian Film Festival". Wong Hoyi is a senior dramatist in Hong Kong. His most controversial work is "Intrigue" which he directed and starred in more than 20 years ago. It is the Cantonese version of the famous American foul-mouthed play "American Buffalo". He used a lot of Cantonese foul language and the theaters were always full during many re-performances, making him a pioneer of swearing on the Hong Kong stage. His subsequent independent film Thunderstorm, adapted from Cao Yu's famous play, also controversially dealt with sexual issues, but failed at the box office."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Wong Ho Yi (traditional Chinese: 黃浩義; simplified Chinese: 黄浩义) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 07:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The policies say that articles containing flaws should not be deleted if they can be improved. Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion says,If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page. Wikipedia:Editing policy#Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required says,Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. Cunard (talk) 07:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse breathing

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient on-point (specifically WP:MEDRS) sources to establish notability for a standalone article. Brief mention may be due elsewhere (Qigong?) Bon courage (talk) 06:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Martial arts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. 5Q5|^✉ 11:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Malwa College of Nursing

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominated this in 2008, when it was kept with the reason "Degree-giving institution, ergo notable". Our standards have tightened since then, but nobody has improved the article. It is still promotional and substantially unsourced, reading e.g. "Malwa College of Nursing® was established in the year 2000". The article essentially serves as an extension of the college's website. In addition to WP:GNG, which still applies since the article cites no third-party coverage, deletion seems appropriate per WP:TNT and WP:V. Sandstein 05:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Sandstein 05:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Medicine, and Punjab. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Premier International IB World School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The given sources are primary. No other independent coverage available on web. One link is non functional. Lacks notability. Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, and Nepal. Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As a private school, the relevant SNG is WP:NORG. We need significant coverage at WP:ORGDEPTH in independent reliable secondary sources. That is certainly lacking in the article, and I cannot find it in searches either. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Alderete

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In my WP:BEFORE, I found only one reliable independent source with significant coverage of the subject to count towards WP:BIO [34], which I added to the article. The other two sources cited in the article are not independent. I checked WP:NPROF and I think the only criteria that might apply is #1, for citations. Her Google Scholar profile [35] gives an h-index of around 30, which I suggest is borderline; I do note that the article had explicitly been undraftified with this commentrespectable h-index, may meet WP:NPROF. I submit that it doesn't, and therefore than an article now is too soon. As an alternative to deletion, I would be happy for the article to be draftified again for future expansion and resubmisssion when notability is clearer. SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:08, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Health and fitness, and Environment. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would argue the one article the nom cites as potentially meeting WP:BIO is not in-depth enough count towards significance --- it's largely interview responses. From a public health perspective, the potential link between pollution and allergies/asthma/diabetes was established well before Aderelte's career began (e.g. [36]), so much of her research isn't groundbreaking in the field. I wouldn't even draftify this as academics usually take a while to become notable and it's likely to languish there for years. If Alderete becomes notable in the future someone can rewrite based on newer and better information. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 12:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Anonrfjwhuikdzz if she passes WP:NPROF then she does not need to pass WP:BIO as well. Based on her GS profile and similar cases in the past, she probably passes the bar for NPROF. --hroest 15:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, and I admit I am also generally skeptical of WP:NPROF as setting too low a bar for notability among academics. I'm not a fan of h-index or other citation metrics for establishing notability since I think such metrics skew incentives for scientific investigation. Raw citation counts are also difficult to use since some fields can be much more citation-happy than others.

I took a brief look at three of Alderete's publications based on the weak keep votes, and I'm not impressed by the quality of the science in two so I am still sticking with my delete vote (the third was too specialized for me to understand well enough).

As an aside, the first paper I have concerns with are [37] which throws out measured infant masses in the methods section instead of using averages/standard deviations. I'd expect to get fired if I used such a method. Including standard deviations in mass would likely make the correlations appear much weaker than stated in the paper. The second is this one which does not include income as a potential confounding factor (incomes are generally lower near sources of pollution, and lower incomes mean healthier foods can be unaffordable, so could that be a more reasonable explanation for the observed correlation?). Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:47, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont disagree with you, I also feel this is a case just at the edge. However, the reason we are lenient for articles of professors / scientists is the Strickland case and the fact that its often fiendishly difficult for Wikipedians to judge academic research quality (and takes up a lot of time). Therefore peer assessment is what we go for and everything else borders on WP:OR. Personally, I am not familiar with the standard methodology for infant weight/length measurements, in some cases outlier removal is a valid method and treating outliers as if they come from a normally distributed set of values is also a mistake by itself. Maybe its just nontrivial to get a baby to hold still in a scale :-) ? I also agree that income could be a confounding factor for the other study, however they do mention they use parental education as a proxy for socioeconomic status so there is an attempt to control for it but there is no evidence to support this choice. Either way, it would be good if the discussion of the results would have included this limitation but it does not necessarily invalidate the whole study. --hroest 13:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak Keep this person (just) passes WP:NPROF#1 with an h-index of 33 and 13 of her publications cited 100+ times. This indicates an impact in her academic field as per guidelines. --hroest 15:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep and repair. There were some very strange statements such as her currently being a postdoctoral scholar (at the same time as an associate professor), I removed that one as I don't believe it. Her h-index is borderline, as others have said, but her citation trend is very strongly increasing so I am OK to give her the benefit of the doubt. Someone badly needs to repair the page. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Reyes Marión

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. He was an officer in wars involving the Dominican Republic, but hardly a "national hero". I couldn't find anything more than passing mentions. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Dominican Republic. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meets WP:GNG. Pasados (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The whole article depends on a single source. CharlesWain (talk) 05:06, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If he were a National Hero, it would not be hard for him to meet WP:SIGCOV or to at least get info from more than one source. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 15:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the source already in the article, there is a paragraph (9 lines) about him in "Soldados de la Independencia, Generales de la Restauración1." Edición Conmemorativa 150 años del triunfo de la Guerra Restauradora, 1865-2015 84.190 (2015), p 56 [38], and his name appears in many other histories, with publication dates from 1900 to 2004, of which I can only see snippet views in Google Books. The article needs editing (and a Talk page). RebeccaGreen (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per comments of RebeccaGreen Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the work of Rebecca the sources are in depth and reliable so the article passes gng Scooby453w (talk) 11:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perl Object-Oriented Persistence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only two sources currently linked in the article are self-promotional (from the creator of the POOP system or instructional websites explaining Perl). WP:BEFORE search yields coverage of Object-oriented programming, but I'm not seeing significant coverage of this specific acronym or concept within reliable sources - so, POOP fails WP:NSOFT. Flip^and Flopped ㋡ 04:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Technology, and Computing. Flip^and Flopped ㋡ 04:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Bankstown City Lions season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This football season may be too far down the pyramid to meet WP:GNG. Almost all of the players are redlinks and all of the coverage seems to be primary sources, including Facebook. Any relevant information here could be put on 2024 Football NSW season; having said that, there is no prose to begin with. C 679 04:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Football, and Australia. C 679 04:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Servite et contribuere please elaborate further on how this article meets GNG. I would love to know. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 04:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Rugby League World Cup qualification play-off

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was redirected to 2000 Rugby League World Cup qualifying but reverted. As per WP:SPORTSEVENT: Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats. LibStar (talk) 03:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Rugby league, Lebanon, and United States of America. LibStar (talk) 03:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be notable enough Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough for a stand-alone article, and the match details are already included on the 2000 Rugby League World Cup qualifying page. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I previously redirected the page. Article is too small to warrant its own page, in addition deletion should occur for the same rational listed by the nominator. Mn1548 (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – nothing here that is not in the main qualification article. A google search gave a couple of articles in The Independent, one about a Lebanon player/assistant coach being refused entry to the US and the one that gives the match report, but not much else to indicate notability. EdwardUK (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navneet Singh (entrepreneur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entrepreneur. Mostly promotional articles, passing mentions, and interviews. The available "significant coverage" (the DNAIndia article, for example) is of dubious independence/reliability. Mooonswimmer 18:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Bihar. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you retract the above comment; see WP:ASPERSIONS Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Im sry guys,have written like 5 articles since morning and i took good care that i use proper sources and I DID.I dunno what this dude saw in my article.There were some poorly sourced references and he removed them,rather then deleting it i askdd him to tell me what to improve there.Again,I'm sry Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 20:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 20:28, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable enough Servite et contribuere (talk) 10:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Here's a quick rundown of the sources used in the article.

FE Lifestyle (The Financial Express) - appears to be independent, but no author listed and there's a lot of promotional language/adjectives going on.
Weekend Leader - Seemingly independent profile
CXO Today - interview, does not contribute to notability
DNA India - Seemingly independent profile
TechGraph - interview
BW Businessworld - link redirects to main webpage, cannot find page saved on the Wayback Machine
The Economic Times "startup ranking" - 404 error, not archived on Wayback Machine
FICCI - 404 error, not archived on Wayback Machine
The Economic Times "women..." - passing mention, does not support statement in article

ForsythiaJo (talk) 20:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well accr to me its good enough but if yall insist,can we mark it as stub? Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 20:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the bad references,the remaining are good enough in my view Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.191.102 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate vote, since this is clearly the author voting while logged out. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have repaired this nomination to reflect that it is for Navneet Singh (entrepreneur), not Navneet Singh(Entrepreneur). That was the original name for this article, but it was renamed 14 minutes before it was nominated (but presumably, since this was a Twinkle-assisted nomination, while the nominator was preparing it). The original title was deleted via R2, which made it seem like the article had already been deleted itself when it had not been (and also could have theoretically been mistaken for a misplaced RfD, but it is clear the nomination is for the actual article). No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have kept these 2 references which accr to me are good enough Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Check article for the sources i have kept Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, Nowhere i can find WP:SIGCOV and this particular topic fails to satisfy WP:GNG. Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 12:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Reads like a resume. Founded a business, then lists what the business does... Sourcing is as explained a few comments above this one. Nothing notable about this person, not meeting biographical requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How about i ahorten the article to just one para,no promotion,no length biography,just a short note about this person? Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 16:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shorten Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 16:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You may stop replying to everyone now. We hear that you want to improve the article, you don't need to state it again and again. Geschichte (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well ill leave it to fate then Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 19:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kaukab Rizwan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single source in non reputed media. Not an independent in depth coverage about subject. No other online coverage which meets requirement of a biography article. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Aviation, India, and Bihar. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While her achievement is laudable, "first [religion+gender] [job] from [subnational district]" doesn't confer notability, and there's no indication that WP:NPERSON is met here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an article which lacks notability. Achievement is not as such which meets notability guidelines.Almandavi (talk) 06:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep,shes notable enough,being the first in a minority community to do so.If the problem is with notability then this is good enough,if its references,then just tell me,ill improve it Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 10:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added more sources,can we remove the afd now?idk why you guys think that she's not notable Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 10:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

if the sources had more lasting coverage that's more then the week she became a pilot I would vote to keep Scooby453w (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gimme some time Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When you need to go to such specific detail to get to the "first", it's not notable. I could be the first X coloured person from my hometown who got a degree in Y at Z and went on to become a trapeze artist. Doesn't make me notable. Also are they the first woman Muslim pilot from that area, or are they the first woman Muslim commercial airline pilot from that area? Those two things are not the same. Canterbury Tail talk 17:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Begusarai is not your town,its the industrial and financial capital of bihar where muslims make up a large part of the pop..Unlike your town that pop. Is higher than many country and also not the first commercial,shes allover first Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleared and defined my stance,will leave ut to yall now,bye Thatonewikipediadude (talk) 19:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the subject's achievements are commendable but they and the related soft-focussed coverage, all dating to mid-Sep 2022, do not rise to meeting the notability standard under WP:GNG, WP:NBIO or WP:BLP1E. Besides notability issues, note that the current and previous versions of the article contain many details (subject's birth year, her BA degree, her being a virtual mentor, her activities in Jan 2023 etc) that are not verified by the cited sources and indicate either LLM hallucinations or, more likely, COI/UPE editing. I asked the article editor for clarification but they evaded providing an explanation and are now blocked. Abecedare (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marian Tupy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance. Refs are a mix of social media and profiles. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. UPE. scope_creep^Talk 02:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Politics, Economics, Africa, South Africa, Europe, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Poorly sourced, no significant coverage in decent sources. Also seems to be largely a copyvio from various places, e.g. https://bookfest.tulane.edu/authors/marian-tupy. I have nominated for WP:G12. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Loyola Jesuit College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to lack WP:SIGCOV and has had WP:PROMO edits. In WP:BEFORE did not find reliable sources such that WP:GNG fails here. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Christianity, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very week keep The promo in the past is true but I think the school barely makes the cut. Google used to be bad in covering African news sources in their indexing process but I don't know if that is still the case. If so, there should be untapped sources available on paper but not on the internet. The Banner talk 11:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I can find in my Wikipedia:BEFORE. If you find enough for coverage, I could withdraw my nomination, but I did not find much on this "college". Iljhgtn (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shaping Seattle: Buildings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local government website. PROD previously declined with a suggestion to merge the content somewhere, but there's no clear place to merge it to -- there's no article for Seattle Department of Construction & Inspections (the agency that runs the website) and it would be WP:UNDUE in the main Seattle or even Government and politics of Seattle articles. Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Websites, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the existing references appear to pass GNG, with the King5, GeekWire, and WaPo sites. Have you been able to access and review these? Linkrot appears to have claimed one, and another is paywalled for me. Jclemens (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Washington Post article has two sentences:Seattle, though, has already built a platform tracking new real-estate projects that hints at what could be possible. Projects that have to go through a design review are all mapped by the city here, with each one linked to a timeline, images and public documents. Not exactly WP:SIGCOV. King 5, KPLU, and CityLab are all just regurgitating the press release announcing the website, which also doesn't count towards notability. GeekWire is the only one that comes close, but that article is much more about Seattle in Progress than Shaping Seattle. I haven't been able to find anything else that counts towards notability either, with all of the coverage just being "hey, this exists" regurgitations of the press release from 2015 -- nothing from the decade since then. Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Westland, Putnam County, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A failed village. As a rule we have deleted these. Mangoe (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: GNIS is not sufficient for an article. We need real sources, of which I could find none. Satellite view shows a bend in the road. Not notable. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Salem Al-Tunaiji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The added sources [39] are merely results listings and not SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and United Arab Emirates. LibStar (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as ATD, to United Arab Emirates at the 1992 Summer Olympics. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect – Per above. Svartner (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to United Arab Emirates at the 1992 Summer Olympics: Cursory searches reveal no WP:SIGCOV for WP:SPORTSBASIC to be met here. Let'srun (talk) 19:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Claytus Taqimama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NATH. Simply competing in world championships does not confer notability. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sport of athletics, and Oceania. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable sprinter who achieved nothing of significance and a lack of sources to show for it Scooby453w (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rhea May Taleb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Middle East. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 07:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Lebanon women's international footballers as possible search term. Giant Snowman 17:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Souad Takash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Middle East, and Lebanon. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Lebanon women's international footballers as possible search term. Giant Snowman 17:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Arya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Hotel photographer" of highly questionable provenance. This seems advertorial. BD2412 T 01:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Photography, and India. BD2412 T 01:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Delhi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Basail Govinda Government High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School does not seem to be notable. Plainly existing does not make a school notable - the school lacks reliable, secondary coverage upon search and therefore we cannot assume that the school is notable per WP:NSCHOOL or WP:GNG. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Gunter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As genuinely cool and entertaining as the bus-jumping incident is, this seems like a clear WP:1E fail. — Moriwen (talk) 00:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and England. — Moriwen (talk) 00:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - maybe this is the time to Ignore all rules. This was, after all, covered in Time Magazine. — Maile (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree with this as it was very much a well publicised event and it is also such a good story in my opinion Jack Smart (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn’t this fall under the “ if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified.” Because of its relation to the much larger tower bridge article it is mentioned in where it is basically only a line there and if you want to learn more you click on him and find out more

I have tried finding out about his time in the war but could not find the records as I didn't have access to the archives because I couldn’t find any that wasn’t they were behind a pay wall Jack Smart (talk) 01:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Amberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO. City Clerk of Chicago is not an office which confers inherent notability (nor is penitentiary commissioner, another office he appears to have held). Search turns up some mentions of his name but no significant coverage. — Moriwen (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Illinois. — Moriwen (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I've put this in the wrong place: Amberg was an elected official whose office (City Clerk of Chicago) has a Wikipedia page with numerous officeholders' biographies included on Wikipedia. City Clerk of Chicago was and remains notable, hence many holders of this office have Wikipedia biographies and the office has its own page.

Delete like I said in the other clerk nomination this page is a permstub with no sourcing and it's a minor politician being the city clerk of Chicago doesn't garuntee notability Scooby453w (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John G. Neumeister

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO. Search found a few passing mentions (eg this one) in his capacity either as merchant or city clerk, but no significant coverage. City Clerk of Chicago is not a political office which confers inherent notability. — Moriwen (talk) 00:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Illinois. — Moriwen (talk) 00:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor political page with almost no sourcing being a city clerk is not notable and the lack of reliable sources (that aren't passing mentions) shows that. Scooby453w (talk) 11:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christophe Pognon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, based on misunderstanding of the sports guidelines. While I acknowledge we do not have easy access to newspapers from Benin, Pognon's competition in the Davis cup as well as the Sydney Olympics should have generated some coverage, but given his early exit and relatively low highest raning, it does not appear that he was. All I have been able to find is this brief match recap, this is slightly longer but of unknown reliability and this which has the same info as the one prior. I'm not sure whether Davis Cup or the Olympics would be the best redirect target, should consensus emerge for one. Star Mississippi 00:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Tennis, and Africa. Star Mississippi 00:20, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Courtesy ping to PROD contester @Plutonium27:. Jay Cubby 04:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect I was going to AFD this when I saw the PROD had been declined but thought I would get inundated with nonsense about how playing in the Olympics made the article undeletable. Since someone else has been braver than I and nominated, I will add my support to the article being removed. All the coverage I can find about this tennis player is that he played, and lost, one match at the Olympics. Even that coverage is very light. Perhaps an ATD would be a redirect to Tennis at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Men's singles. Anxioustoavoid talk 08:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yet another Olympic stub of a player who didn't really actually do anything IN the Olympics Scooby453w (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Like others, I don't see any WP:SIGCOV for this subject to meet the WP:SPORTSBASIC guidelines. BLP's require strong secondary sourcing, and that doesn't appear to be here for this individual. Don't see a clear redirect target either. Let'srun (talk) 19:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Chasi Kalyan Samiti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable NGO. Otherthan some passing mentions, there is zero significant coverage about this NGO. Also, all the sources mentioned talks about it’s parents organisations Bangladesh Jamaate Islami. Notability isn’t inherited. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passing mentions? To you even in-depth sources are passing mentions i have seen, it can mention Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, what's the problem, the topic is indeed covered, read WP:Before and it clearly passes WP:GNG BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 01:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not even 2 months old, give me some time to improve the page and rest alright? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This only source might be somewhat significant coverage. Other than that, there is zero significant coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources for this organization to meet the criteria of WP:GNG. Please show me three best sources that provide significant coverage, are reliable, and independent of the subject, I will withdraw my nomination. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 01:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its best that you apply WP:B before you nominate articles for AfD, recently i set a limit where I have to make each of my articles pass WP:GNG in atleast 15 months if sources are found, now this article i was still checking on to see if it passes Wikipedia policies, you used to nominate several of my articles for deletion, some actually made sense because many were just passing mentions (here) but slowly the quality of reasons of your AfDs have been decreasing, just my opinion. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources that meet notability? Please check the article or these are the sources for you, here, here, here, you can check other sources in the page too, if you want proof that the publishers are reliable then, see this. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure why you think I didn’t check before nominating. I’m sorry, but the three sources you provided is not significant coverage.

জামায়াতী এনজিও চাষী কল্যাণ সমিতির মাধ্যমে জঙ্গী অর্থায়ন - somewhat significant coverage, talks about how jamatee funds throug this organisation
জামায়াত-শিবিরের অঙ্গসংগঠন কীভাবে চিহ্নিত হবে? - passing mentions
8 held for allegedly financing militancy through NGO - passing mentions

With this, I cannot say that the organization meets the criteria of WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Bangladesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]