Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties, and editors at /Workshop, arbitrators may make proposals which are ready for voting. Arbitrators will vote for or against each provision, or they may abstain. Only items which are supported by an absolute majority of the active, non-recused arbitrators will pass into the final decision. Conditional votes and abstentions will be denoted as such by the arbitrator, before or after their time-stamped signature. For example, an arbitrator can state that their support vote for one provision only applies if another provision fails to pass (these are denoted as "first" and "second choice" votes). Only arbitrators and clerks may edit this page, but non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

If observing editors notice any discrepancies between the arbitrators' tallies and the final decision or the #Implementation notes, you should post to the clerk talk page. Similarly, arbitrators may request clerk assistance via the same method, or via the clerks' mailing list.

Under no circumstances may this page be edited by anyone other than members of the Arbitration Committee or the clerks. Please submit comments on the proposed decision in your own section on the talk page.

Arbitrators may place proposed motions affecting the case in this section for voting. Typical motions might be to close or dismiss a case without a full decision (a reason should normally be given). Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion.

Motions require an absolute majority of all active, unrecused arbitrators (same as the final decision). See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Motions to dismiss.

1) Because Andrevan (talk · contribs) has resigned as an administrator and a bureaucrat, this case is dismissed. Andrevan may not regain either the administrator or bureaucrat permission without passing a new request for adminship and/or bureaucratship.

Passed 12 to 0 on 14:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Support:

1. Now that Andrevan has resigned both tools, there is really no reason to continue the case. If there are any other conduct issues they can be handled by the community. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
2. Given his resignation, this seems appropriate. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
3. The piece the community couldn't solve was an examination of admin/bureaucrat. That is now moot. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
4. Newyorkbrad (talk) 06:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
5. Worm^TT(talk) 06:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
6. This settles everything that actually needed a case. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
7. Katie^talk 13:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
8. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
9. DGG ( talk ) 14:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
10. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
11. Arbitrator Mkdw (talk · contribs) by email – Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
12. Arbitrator Euryalus (talk · contribs) by email – Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments from arbitrators:

A temporary injunction is a directive from the Arbitration Committee that parties to the case, or other editors notified of the injunction, do or refrain from doing something while the case is pending. It can also be used to impose temporary sanctions (such as discretionary sanctions) or restrictions on an article or topic. Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion.

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed, unless there are at least four votes to implement immediately. See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Passing of temporary injunctions.

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

5) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

6) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

7) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

8) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

9) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

10) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

5) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

6) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

7) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

9) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

10) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

11) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

5) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

6) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

7) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

8) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

9) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

10) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

11) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

12) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

13) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.

In accordance with the procedure for the standard enforcement provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

In accordance with the procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

Comments:

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

3) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

4) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Comments:

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

These notes were last updated by ***ADD SIGNATURE HERE***; the last edit to this page was on 14:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC) by Miniapolis.

Proposals with voting still underway (no majority)

Principles: All

Findings: All

Remedies: All

Enforcement provisions: Pass by default

Proposals which have passed

Principles: None, yet

Findings: None, yet

Remedies: None, yet

Enforcement provisions: Pass by default

Proposals which cannot pass

Principles: None, yet

Findings: None, yet

Remedies: None, yet

Enforcement provisions: Pass by default

Important: Please ask the case clerk to author the implementation notes before initiating a motion to close, so that the final decision is clear.

Four net "support" votes (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") or an absolute majority are needed to close the case. The Clerks will close the case 24 hours after the fourth net support vote has been cast, unless an absolute majority of arbitrators vote to fast-track the close.

Support

Oppose

Comments