Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1/24 Social Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1/24 Social Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance or notability Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless one or both existing non-English sources are determined to be reliable and independent and/or independent, reliable sources are added, AND between the independent, reliable sources, it significant coverage is shown. If the non-English sources are reliable and independent, a partial translation and summary on the talk page will help a lot in determining if there is significant coverage. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, though agree with davidwr idea.--Surv1v4l1st ^{▌Talk|Contribs▌} 00:05, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. If it is not deleted, it should be drafted; in its current state the article isn't clear about what the subject actually is/does, "This is a volunteer organization, dedicate to serve society." could be anything.   // Timothy :: talk  19:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. There is nothing here that could be construed as demonstrating notability, and virtually no information about the subject other than its existence. So what? I can't even say it "fails" GNG, since it never even tries to pass. jp×g 06:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.