Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11 AM
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, no content left after copyvio has been deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- 11 AM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced promotional article about a very new television program. No evidence of notabilty. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 18:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete No real content or context, no verifiable notability. Appears to be self-promotion. I feel like a tourist (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.