Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1992–93 SAARC Quadrangular

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Going to assume there are non-English language sources per User:Rugbyfan22. Missvain (talk) 16:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1992–93 SAARC Quadrangular (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 03:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep Not 100% certain on the policy for tours, but this was a LA tour featuring international sides. There is coverage of the tournament in an internet search, and I imagine there'd likely be more offline and in Bangladeshi sources. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I just wanted to let you know about WP:NEVENT guideline which says sources should be in-depth, diverse, and has received coverage for a duration. Thanks. Störm (talk) 04:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per Rugbyfan22. Otinflewer (talk) 11:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per Rugbyfan22. — A.A Prinon  ^{Leave a dialogue} 10:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per Rugbyfan22. StickyWicket (talk) 11:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.