Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Turkey UFO sightings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Turkey UFO sightings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Our guidelines for writing articles about these kinds of subjects explicitly warn against using News-of-the-Weird (in The Daily Telegraph as such a story) or slow news day reporting to establish notability of an event of dubious provenance. Tabloid journalism is right out (using The Sun as a reliable source as is done in this article is pretty embarrassing). In this case, a cursory investigation led to the conclusion that this brouhaha was over a hoax perpetuated by a single individual. There is not likely to be any further development of sources which would satisfy our independent sourcing requirements and this remains essentially a WP:ONEEVENT problem here. jps (talk) 12:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator arguments that I share. (Also I was there at the time and did not see anything. :-) --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, no notability, few poor quality sources, one hoax by one person with no significant coverage. - - MrBill3 (talk) 07:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.