Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 incident at Echilitash border post

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2012 incident at Echilitash border post

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently doesn't meet notability criteria and I can't find more reliable secondary sources that could be added to make it meet WP:N Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kyrgyzstan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - subject seems to lack "significant coverage" in reliable sources and is therefore not notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENT. Insufficient multiple reliable sources that give in-depth coverage of the event. Event has not received significant coverage long after the event took place thus fails WP:PERSISTENCE.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We're not a newspaper. Could be adequately addressed in brief (sentence or two in a timeline article, perhaps). Neutrality^talk 00:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.