Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 PIHA Pro season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Already deleted by Juliancolton as part of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 PIHA season. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2013–14 PIHA Pro season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not Trivial. Standard season page for a professional sports league. -DJSasso (talk) 16:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I am not convinced that a minor professional sports league like this needs to have season articles. Of course it can have season articles but the usual rules apply. That means valid referencing and a demonstration of notability. What we have here is nothing more than a link to the top level of the PIHA's website. That is not sufficient for verifiability and I see this as just over-detailed sportscruft of no encyclopaedic value. If the article were stripped down to what can be reliably referenced and had some third party references then that might be OK. Alternatively, if that only left a couple of sentences, that could be merged elsewhere. The Google News links don't show any obvious candidates for sources though. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.