Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 Brazil network television schedule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 06:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2014–15 Brazil network television schedule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a television guide. I am also nominating these articles for the same reason: 2013–14 Brazil network television schedule and 2012–13 Brazil network television schedule. Dcbanners (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 01:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 01:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Such a listing is not just an electronic program guide to be used to select what to view, which is what the cited guideline aims at.The guide says "For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable. " bold added) It is part of the historical record of what decisions were made in creating a program lineup to gain and hold viewers. We have kept numerous such historic network programming lineups in previous AFDs, and the guide specifically makes an exception for such historic schedules. It is not a listing telling what will happen in the programs to be broadcast tonight. Edison (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Edison; yeah, we already have stuff such as the links that go here and they've gone through without an AFD deletion. m'encarta (t) 23:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.