Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Shopian firing incident

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Shopian firing incident

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was just like one of the hundreds of encounters that take place in Kashmir Valley on a daily basis. This article is an exaggeration of an event which never got any coverage after a few days of the event. These types of encounters are very common in Kashmir, the sources used are mainly Breaking News sources which didn't cover the topic after a few days. Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:LASTING. ML^talk 15:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage was temporary. Fails WP:LASTING and WP:NOTNEWS. lorstaking 01:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete Temporary coverage. Fails WP:LASTING and WP:NOTNEWS. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 02:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]
Delete - as of today only temporary coverage.BabbaQ (talk) 23:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the above participants, but wanted to add that searching for sources suggests this was one of at least a few such "incidents" of which most if not all appear to be largely short-term news items. This may be the worst of them, but doesn't seem particularly notable in the grand scheme of an encyclopedia. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.