Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Pilatus PC 12 crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Pilatus PC 12 crash

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

General Aviation crash without anyone notable are rarely notable and WP:NOTNEWS applies. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tragic but non-notable without other reasons for notability, not apparent in the article.--Petebutt (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm leaning towards keeping the article at the moment, with coverage from sites such as the BBC 1 and NY Post 2, as well as coverage spanning the month of December 2019 (not just one day), I'll venture to say that this event passes WP:GNG and does not qualify for the definition set forth by WP:NOTNEWS. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GA crashes with no deaths of notable persons and no effect on aviation as a whole should not be considered notable. While I appreciate that multiple news organizations picked up the story, WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE also needs to be taken into account. Carguychris (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fatal General Aviation accidents are fairly common and would have to be of particular note to gain a stand-alone article, I dont see anything that makes this pass the bar. MilborneOne (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't seem to have involved any Wikinotable people. Mjroots (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Every year there are thousands of light aircraft accidents like this one. Nothing distinguishes this from the myriad of other ones that we have no articles about: no wiki-notable people involved, no lasting effects, no airworthiness directives, no changes to regulations, no changes to ATC procedures. - Ahunt (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not enough notability to have a stand alone article. - Samf4u (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ahunt reasoning.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.