Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Consensus on WP:CRYSTAL / WP:TOOSOON. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon for a separate article from 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries - the article is mainly speculation based on a single recent press release. Arglebargle79 spun off this (as well as the candidates page) from that page and appears extremely upset by that last decision; there is no way a merge/redirect back would be noncontroversial. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries or delete: There is no substantive content, and WP:CRYSTAL applies until more reliable sources are published that would make the subject deserving of its own article. ComplexRational (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, not enough to justify a separate article at this point. Mélencron (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP. There is enough to justify an article, and it is NOT based on a "single press release." It in fact was a press conference by the Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As the DNC is the authorizing entity, it is entirely reliable. The organization process has officially started and the approximate schedule has been announced. No things are going to change, of course, and there's going to be lots of complaints and the like as there were the last few times, Gary Johnson, for example. I know, a call for deletion of EVERY article for events that have been scheduled in advance is par for the course, but for the love of Mike, leave the article here so we don't have to start over in three weeks....Arglebargle79 (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect still WP:TOOSOON for this one. A redirect will leave the history intact so you don't have to "start over" when the time comes, but I would strongly suggest asking on the talk page before arbitrarily reinstating it, if this were to pass as a redirect. SportingFlyer talk 07:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.