Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20Collective
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 20:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
20Collective
- 20Collective (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined a CSD for this article as I didn't think it was completely unsalvageable in terms of sounding like an advertisement, but I can't find any reliable source coverage of this group. Sam Walton (talk) 17:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I couldn't find any sources either, which is why it was also tagged for WP:CSD#A7 speedy deletion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - My first searches immediately found no good third-party coverage. SwisterTwister talk 18:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.