Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3-Demon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3-Demon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability - sole sources on article is a MobyGames listing, a playable version of the game itself on Archive.org, and a mention of the game in an ad for shareware, nothing demonstrating notability. I was unable to find any reliable sources discussing the game on Archive.org (largely getting results for an Amiga 3D model program of the same name) or Google. Article was previously deleted by PROD. Waxworker (talk) 12:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 12:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Could not find sources in a google search to prove notability. Lightoil (talk) 14:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I found this, but as nom said, most hits are for an Amiga design program that is unquestionably notable and should probably exist here instead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Found nothing on Google or Newspapers.com. Timur9008 (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.