Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.N.S

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments for these article's inclusion have been made during this discussion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A.N.S

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article, lapsing into an advertorial tone in some places ("They were well received in this foreign land which jump started what was soon to become a whirlwind of international success"), about a band which has a potentially valid claim to passing WP:NMUSIC for touring, but completely fails to source it properly. The sourcing here is entirely to primary sources, blogs and an online music store, with no evidence of reliable source coverage in real media shown at all. A band does not get over NMUSIC just because passage of an NMUSIC criterion is claimed -- it gets over NMUSIC when passage of an NMUSIC criterion is verified by reliable source coverage. Also adding their one album which has a separate article, whose only substantive sources are a music store, directory listings on discogs.com and user-generated non-professional reviews on eMusic and amazon.com. Delete both. Bearcat (talk) 16:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as I found nothing which is not surprising and the current article contains nothing imaginably better. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.