Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A2 Racer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Davilex Games which is also at AfD. The future of this redirect will therefore depend on the outcome of that debate Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- A2 Racer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game Videogameplayer99 (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable per nom. Not sufficient sources to pass GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- I took a look through Google; most of the news coverage is in Dutch, indicating that it probably does not have notability (in that there are very few works, which may also be local, not in that the single language makes the sources unusable). Redirect to the developing entity, which is Davilex Games. --Izno (talk) 04:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- The article on Davilex Games seems like it violates WP:NCORP and should be deleted as well. I nominated it for AfD and prodded a related title that was also non notable.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge with article PC Games - this article is a one-sentence article, and a merge with a longer article should not prove difficult. Vorbee (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Vorbee: The article you linked is about a video game magazine. Why is that a suitable merge target? --Izno (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Many apologies - I meant to put in PC game.Vorbee (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- It would have the wrong WP:WEIGHT there. --Izno (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- That would also be a violation of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. It has to be related to the article in question in more than just a tangential way.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- It would have the wrong WP:WEIGHT there. --Izno (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Many apologies - I meant to put in PC game.Vorbee (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Vorbee: The article you linked is about a video game magazine. Why is that a suitable merge target? --Izno (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- WP:ATD-R Redirect to developer as valid search term before nominating for deletion. If the dev article is later deleted, so be it, but until then, that's the best course. czar 07:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- When you say Redirect to developer, I take it you mean redirect to Davilex Games. Vorbee (talk) 10:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, as Izno said, "Redirect to the developing entity, which is Davilex Games." czar 15:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- When you say Redirect to developer, I take it you mean redirect to Davilex Games. Vorbee (talk) 10:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.