Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AAFID
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 01:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
AAFID
- AAFID (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable intrusion detection system. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC).
- Delete. This is where the term comes from; it looks more like a research project than a working technology. There are a few papers around, but probably all from connected research groups. TigraanClick here to contact me 16:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It indeed appears to be a cancelled research platform with only some primary sources. DeVerm (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as Books is finding quite a few books and guides but there's still nothing particularly noticing of a notably improvable article. SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.