Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFK Gaming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFK Gaming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an notable esport news coverage agency, mostly known for PR article's in india. Warm Regards---Abhay EsportsTalk To Me 23:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This website is already having mentions from Top tier news website such as TechRadar, IGN, Digit (magazine), Sportskeeda, Gadgets360. According to Similarweb this website is having over 2.10 million readers per month and already having mentions of some existing Wikipedia articles as references example Video games in India. -- Iamrajdeepdas (talk) 02:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Readership and mentions on other websites do not make for notability on Wikipedia. IceWelder [✉] 06:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Some outlets mention it briefly (WP:PASSING) as part of routine news (WP:RUNOFTHEMILL) but never discuss it detail (WP:SIGCOV). IceWelder [✉] 06:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article comes off like a ref bombed advert and all the references contain trivial, non-notable subject matter. What the sites Alexa rank is or how many visitors per month it gets doesn't make it notable either. Only sustained, in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources does. I get the feeling that it's to early in the websites life for that kind of coverage to occur yet though. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.