Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AINA PTT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AINA PTT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORGCRIT as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, a before search links to primary sources and sponsored posts. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It seems promotional article also there is not sufficient coverage sources that make the organization notable Rondolinda (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was thinking of nominating this myself due to WP:NCORP failure but you beat me to it; sources do not address the company in enough detail to meet requirements Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article that fails WP:CORP. Any independent RS coverage is routine in nature, failing WP:CORPDEPTH. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.