Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Ordnance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Ordnance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason: This article consists of two sentences in its entirety, making it a stub. The original author hasn't been back to the article for more than a year, plenty of time to complete any continued research and expand on the subject. The whole point of the article seems to be promoting the weapon mentioned; not a bad idea in itself, but not the subject of this article. Due to the brevity of the article, it was inevitable that it would be an orphan as well as a stub. There doesn't appear to be any other articles related to any of the three subjects mentioned, so the information can't be used elsewhere. - Myk Streja (Talk to me) 12:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 13:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Production of 600 units of a weapon is hardly notable; I'd also consider the article abandoned.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 21:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I can only find mentions in various catalogs, which is insufficient for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing⁺⁺11:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, Fails WP:GNG. --Guy Macon (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.