Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AT Black Knight Transformer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted. - Deleted under G5 by Jezebel's Ponyo. (non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 08:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AT Black Knight Transformer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This flying thing doesn't hardly exist yet, except maybe for whatever is shown in promotional videos on the internet. I find no reliable sources, it's not yet in production, and the company making it doesn't seem to be notable either. Drmies (talk) 00:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It fails WP:N, with no third party references to show notability. - Ahunt (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my crystal ball. Nördic Nightfury 11:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not as yet shown to be notable; "still under development"; premature at best. Reads likes a press release and has no RS cites. Kierzek (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't see the in depth independent coverage generally necessary for GNG. Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: I deleted half the article because it was copied verbatim from a source that wasn't linked. [1] Felsic2 (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural note I've speedy deleted the article under G5 criteria as it was created by a (now blocked) sock of Ctway.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.