Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATrueChurch (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ATrueChurch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing at all actually convincing and my own searches are not finding better. SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it should be said that I just nominated this for deletion last month, and the first AfD was non-admin closed no consensus only 2 days ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATrueChurch. As I said there, this is non-notable and largely self-sourced. I felt that it failed WP:ORG as well. WA Post 2005 article linked mentions it only in passing. Outside of Christianity blogs, it does not appear to be the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. I don't consider passing mention in the WA Post to be an adequate source. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sourcing found in the previous discussion. Jclemens (talk)
- This would still not be enough. SwisterTwister talk 03:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Obviously you and I disagree if you're nominating it for deletion and I'm arguing that it be kept on the basis of essentially the same sourcing. Jclemens (talk) 06:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not quite as notable as churches such as Westboro Baptist Church or Dove World Outreach Center (even though I'd argue it's more extreme theological-wise). There's not enough sources outside of Christian blogs and the one Washington Post article (though there were some other articles about them, including one from The Tennessean, that have since been removed from the web). Because of the lack of third-party sources, I'd say delete this, but if more extensive media coverage about them ever comes about, it could be resurrected. NBA2020 (talk) 21:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.