Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Allen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Allen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Not even his first name is known. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There are alot of nominations for deletions for articles on rugby league footballers where there first name isn't known, I think they should all be nominated in the same AfD. ビッグツリ64 (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Block evasion Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:RL/N and WP:GNG. One liners with one reference do not render notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The minimal information is not enough to justify having an article. Merging multiple deletion nomination is a horriable idea. We have seen it done before, and it normally ends in disaster because some people in a group will be notable, and then it stalls because of that, and we end up having to split and redo it. Nominating articles one at a time as was done here is the right move.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.