Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A and C Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 04:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A and C Mall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it is WP:NOTABLE. This would be more difficult as sources may be hard for me to find, but I couldn't verify it. Boleyn (talk) 06:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 06:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 06:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 06:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'll give the creator of this article credit for at least not putting as much uncited information promoting the company as these type of articles do, but the subject itself is way too weak in significant coverage. This page here showed a slight bit of promise, but otherwise I can't see this being a notable-enough topic. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 11:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG, no third party refs, just not notable. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete no inherent notability of shopping malls LibStar (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I saw this moments after it was nominated and it seems clear there are no better signs of even minimally better. Nothing else convincing for notability. SwisterTwister talk 18:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.