Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulkareem Findi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulkareem Findi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single reliable source: either COI source (findi.info) or blogs. No indication of notability. Randykitty (talk) 10:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete-I put a prod up earlier but the creator removed it. Wgolf (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Findi may well be notable, but sources are in Kurdish. My understanding is that in order to be on Wikipedia in English, the subject has to have been written about in English-language WP:RS (i.e., that sources in other languages can be quoted for facts, but English-language sources are required to establish notability).E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Actually, that is incorrect. Sources may be in any language, as long as they are reliable, independent, and enough in-depth to pass WP:GNG (or any specialty guideline). --Randykitty (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Most of the citations go to one source, which seems to be a private website maintained by one with the same surname (as declared on the footer on website. Educationtemple (talk) 13:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.