Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abeil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abeil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced stub article about a little-known fictional species. I couldn't find any mention of them in any reliable independent sources. Not a very active user (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NFICTION. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge' to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 12:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that the proposed target for the merge is also being considered for deletion. Not a very active user (talk) 12:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• I think this could be redirected to Abiel, as it's a likely mispelling 46.132.187.159 (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Very unnotable fictional creature, with nothing in the way of reliable, secondary sources indicating any sort of real world notability. The proposed merge/redirect target is already a bloated, border-line unnotable list, so I don't recommend any sort of redirection there. The IP user's suggestion of using this as a redirect as a potential misspelling of Abiel is not a bad one, and can be done after this is deleted. Rorshacma (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.