Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Awasthi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Awasthi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NPOL for not occupying any notable political office, and WP:GNG for not having sufficient sources that satisfy WP:IRS and covers them substantially. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, India, and Australia. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Abhiimanyu7 (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Both appear to be rather minor political positions, this person wouldn't pass NPOL. They exist and have coverage, but nothing notable about them. Oaktree b (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Himachal Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Subject holds position in a notable city, and has coverage by both Australian an Indian media. There are more than enough sources to indicate that the subject holds notability in more than just passing mentions in media. Viatori (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All cities in Wikipedia are notable, so that's a useless claim for inherent notability. LibStar (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nomination. Deputy mayor of a city is not a notable position as per Wp:NPOL. Zuck28 (talk) 01:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete don't see evidence of notable achievements to meet WP:BIO. Not inherently notable as deputy mayor. LibStar (talk) 10:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Awasthi's status as Deputy Mayor, as opposed to Mayor, of Bendigo means he falls short of WP:NPOL guidelines. Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject fails WP:NPOL, I can not see enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources. B-Factor (talk) 12:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:NPOL. RangersRus (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES. The subject is the deputy mayor of a city of 120,000 people. The growing consensus has been to delete the articles of similar nature. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom , Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.