Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Sidharth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Sidharth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable indiviual. The available sources does not establish notability and appear to be a case of WP:BLP1E. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is a lack of sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of major sources, notablitiy cannot be established.Rafiq Marbaros (talk) 09:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC) — Rafiqmarbaros (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article on a young person who has identified some security vulnerabilities. The best source is a passing mention among others in a Deccan Chronicle item about Google acknowledging and rewarding their notifications. Insufficient to establish encyclopaedic notability for the subject and my searches are not finding better. AllyD (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Weak Keep : Deccan Chronicle , Malayala Manorama , Mathrubhumi are all leading dailies in India and i see the articles are all featuring this person. Which shows there are reliable reference. But only one factor for notability so i go with a Weak keep. BetterSmile:D 17:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs) — Bettersmiley (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.