Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy for Contemporary Problems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Academy for Contemporary Problems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not appear to meet GNG. I can only find things that have been written by it, rather than about it.Gilderien Chat|Contributions 18:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just added a clarification: notable in a specialized field because it contributed to the establishment of a historically-important early computer animation studio in an unusual location (Columbus, OH) through its policy recommendations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1ckFG (talk • contribs) 22:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but maybe mention at one of the related articles (joint ventures) and therefore redirect, as my searches found nothing particularly outstanding here, here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 14:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It closed years ago, was never notable by our standards, and is unlikely to be used as a search term. Bearian (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.