Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Insufficient input despite being listed for 4 weeks, and no agreement between those who have contributed. Michig (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accelerade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came to this page doing citation improvement on random articles from the category for articles needing citation. I could not find sufficient sources for this product (e.g. reviews). It looks not-especially-noteable and also promotional. Vordrak (talk) 22:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Vordrak (talk) 22:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe delete - It'd be nice if things like this got at least decent coverage but my searches found nothing outstandingly significant here and here, here and here (the last one is mostly company press releases) and apparently it's the only sports drink with the patented 4:1 ratio of carbs to protein. It seems it was bought by Cadbury Schweppes (aka Dr. Pepper Group) in 2006 here and some of the News links mention this in passing and Accelerade has sponsored several events and people but I'm not sure if there's much here. SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The Runner's World article, despite its informality, seems a RS review; I think it's enough to show it a major product in its niche. thee are presumably others, but they are hard to sort out from the miscellaneous blog postings--this needs attention from someone who knows the subject. DGG ( talk ) 03:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.