Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acme Idea Factory
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 20:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Acme Idea Factory
- Acme Idea Factory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable think tank/company. The Theosophist (talk) 11:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed; I was about to put a speedy delete tag on it as I felt it met WP:G11 before I saw this. gbrading (ταlκ) 11:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Gbrading: This is only my personal view but I hate using G11 because it is never possible to determine objectively if the author is indeed associated with the subject or just assumed in good faith that it/they were notable.--The Theosophist (talk) 14:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed; I was about to put a speedy delete tag on it as I felt it met WP:G11 before I saw this. gbrading (ταlκ) 11:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now and draft/userfy if wished simply because although this has received recent coverage here (News) and browser, I think this wouldn't be sufficient and we should wait until more coverage has accumulated. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per above comment. I just declined an AfC submission about this same topic. Now that I think about it, Gsjassal19 and Saptarishi12345 might be sockpuppets. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete or return to user namespace per SwisterTwister.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 02:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.