Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Without Borders
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Action Without Borders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Extremely advertorial, not sign of notability. Baum des Lichtes (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 01:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 01:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - I'd say "Speedy" but this terrible nomination has been held over twice. Non-profit NGO established in 1995, meets GNG from the first two footnotes showing, beginning with a long interview with the founder from Forbes. Yikes. AfD is not a cleanup tool. Passes GNG, we're done. Carrite (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep sources seem to indicate this organization is notable according to our standards; also achieves WP:CORPDEPTH at the least. The article needs to be cleaned up or rewritten. Steve Quinn (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.