Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adán Amezcua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, with thanks to the user who (while kindly remembering to assume good faith), pointed out that the subject has significant coverage on Spanish sites (thanks for all the very helpful links!). (non-admin closure) Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adán Amezcua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has had a lengthy playing career, but appears to fail WP:BASE/N. I do not believe there is sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Has significant coverage on Spanish-language sites. Though I'm pretty there is no checking done at all before these AfDs are thrown out there, if on the off-chance there is, I would suggest searching Google.com.mx for guys who have significant careers in Mexico. Alex (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In the future, why don't you save us the snark and stick to helpful comments like this one? Oh, and maybe take your own advice, and search for sources before you de-PROD non-notable articles on the grounds that sources may be out there? Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.