Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam's World of Imagination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Asif Ali (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam's World of Imagination

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable media company with big plans but meagre achievements to-date (one niche film in the Malayalam language). Should normally be speedy deleted under A7 but is being repeatedly resuced by an editor. kashmiri ^TALK 11:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: this does not even seem a company but a brand currently in development. No official company registration number is listed. The published contact email is a @gmail.com address, and the contact phone number is a mobile phone. While this fact alone does not rule out the possibility of being notable, it gives an idea of the size of this entity. Definitely WP:TOOSOON. kashmiri ^TALK 21:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This topic is notable, however the article needs a lot of improvement. So keep the article but make it better. Garagepunk66 (talk) 00:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise with Redirect to Asif Ali as none of this suggests yet solid independent notability and almost of the company's work has been Asif Ali's own films. Notifying tagger Josu4u. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, That's the best decision. I am agreeing with it.Josu4u (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Asif Ali, the company's founder (with the history preserved under the redirect) per SwisterTwister and the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I recommend preserving the history under the redirect so that it can be undone if the company receives substantial coverage in the future. Cunard (talk) 01:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.