Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Gilberti (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Gilberti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE GauchoDude (talk) 23:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can find announcements of performances, but no substantial sources about him. LaMona (talk) 23:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE:

Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

Subject's work has only won the Corwin Competition, which doesn't seem to be notable either, with coverage at all being only in [this]. Therefore I have proved that the subject as well as the Corwin Competition are non-notable. For these reasons, I urge a Deletion consensus. ---Mr. Guye (talk) 03:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only claim to notability is winning the "Corwin Competition". A Google search shows that this competition is utterly non-notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.