Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Handling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC), based on the argument that the sources in the article provide substantive coverage. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Handling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches are finding nothing at all to suggest this can be better notable and I would've PRODed but it may be removed. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Handling is a very well know chef in the UK, a regular on TV and winner of several awards. Not clear what the nomination 'can be better notable' means? Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 13:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep News coverage includes Gdn, Telegraph, 'Indie' + others in UK + catering professional journals. Pincrete (talk) 16:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Plenty of coverage, plenty of awards, and I don't even know what the nominator is saying by "nothing at all to suggest this can be better notable". Smartyllama (talk) 17:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.