Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Said

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Said

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikipedia is not a place where every young entrepreneur will publish their biography. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wikipedia is being used for legitimacy by people who are barely qualified to be on LinkedIn. Dkendr (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as questionably notable and it's likely best not to move instead to the company article as there are risks of this being restarted. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not anywhere near notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.