Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Sutherland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Armchair Cynics. MBisanz ^talk 16:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Sutherland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN musician failing all 12 elements of WP:MUSBIO and WP:GNG The Dissident Aggressor 22:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm not seeing much here. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Armchair Cynics. While there has often been a perception among some Wikipedians that any musician who has ever been in a notable band should always have their own standalone BLP in addition to the article about the band, WP:NMUSIC says that a musician who cannot be adequately sourced as a standalone topic in his own right gets a redirect to the band and not a standalone BLP that's this sparse or this poorly sourced. Bearcat (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Armchair Cynics as per Bearcat. Not enough in-depth coverage to warrant a standalone article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.