Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Waheed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Waheed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and no reliable references provided/avaialble. Only here for promotional purpose. Agent 007 (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Artists, and United States of America. Agent 007 (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, not worth cleaning up the incorrect formatting of sources. The sources are either primary or user generated. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:10, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of significant coverage. I note that Forbes used to be reliable, but is now for sale cheap. Bearian (talk) 03:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that the entire article is based on User:Adam Waheed, seems to be only notable as a result of social media. 3landscape (talk) 04:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have marked the userpage with (U5, G11) Agent 007 (talk) 08:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Bearian and WomenArtistUpdates. This article was written by ChatGPT. It uses **text** for bold and links provided by it have the suffix utm_source=chatgpt.com. Do with that what you will. Cheers, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 15:10, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seriously??? per User:Agent VII Variety312 (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously. Barry Wom (talk) 12:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.