Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addite Malik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 13:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Addite Malik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actress is notable, but the sources included in it do not pass WP:GNG. The attached sources are mentions in news about COVID, birthdays, wedding anniversaries, and restaurants. AShiv1212 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Maharashtra. AShiv1212 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• To assert that the article subject is notable, as you just have, you must have found sources that demonstrate that. Why did you not cite the sources that you had found, instead of nominating the article for deletion? Uncle G (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I watch TV, and I know this actress works as a supporting actor in a TV serial, which is why I mentioned her as notable. I looked for sources and found that Hindustan Times, Times of India, and Indian Express have news articles about her husband, her son, and her fashion. Can these gossip sources be considered reliable? AShiv1212 (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Here are 11 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]sources from Times of India, Indian Express, and Hindustan Times. If these sources can be used to create a page according to Wikipedia guidelines, please try to do so. AShiv1212 (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Please check all the above sources, sir, and determine if they are reliable according to Wikipedia guidelines for retaining the page. If they are, I can provide additional sources with the same news, such as those from Maharashtra Times, Loksatta, and Mumbai Mirror. AShiv1212 (talk) 17:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure what "actress is notable, but the sources included in it do not pass WP:GNG" means. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I have mentioned the actress as "notable" because she has worked in some TV serial. However, there are no reliable sources available for the TV serial she has worked in. All the available sources are gossip-based, such as those mentioning her husband, her pregnancy, her having a child, or her opening a hotel. AShiv1212 (talk) 18:12, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: uh..per nom. The actress is indeed notable and meets WP:NACTRESS with various significant roles in notable productions. -Mushy Yank. 19:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Clearly passes Wp:NACTOR Zuck28 (talk) 08:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Meets GNG. WikiMentor01 (talk) 10:51, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.