Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhiwala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adhiwala

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of existence or notability. Kazamzam (talk) 17:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Pakistan. Kazamzam (talk) 17:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There appear some passing mentions of this name: here, here and here, and the last source infact says,Next day the troops reached Adhiwala and on the 27th Surajkund . Here , on the 28th , Lieut Lake joined the State force as Political Agent , after visiting the Nawāb at Ahmadpur on the 26th but I'm really not sure if this helps around or not. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- This appears to be a real place. If so, we should either Keep or Merge to a successor (or nearby) place. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any sources for this, indications of notability beyond a passing mention, etc.? Kazamzam (talk) 14:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and WP:GEOFEAT. I can't find any information that this has been "officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available". A search of JSTOR, ProQuest, Project Muse returned no results. // Timothy :: talk 12:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 12:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.