Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adios Vaya Con Dios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adios Vaya Con Dios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film that has not yet been released and has no coverage, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 13:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 14:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Bovineboy2008 says, there's no evidence of substantial coverage in independent sources or other basis for this to pass Wikipedia:Notability (films). The article as written reads like marketing material. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Bovineboy2008. The only extant info is from IMDB showing it is preproduction. Does not establish notability.--Theredproject (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMDb does show it's in post production but there are next to no sources available. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note. In a recent edit an editor tried to add a couple of sources [1][2] while also improperly trying to remove the AfD notice. But neither of them qualifies as independent, since they are publicity pieces from the website of the director and the production company. --22:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete per above. It could be userfied, but it'd be best if it was done by a non-COI editor. Other than that, there's just no coverage out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Recently updated Zachary Laoutides Styleology magazine (find it at your local Barnes and Nobel or Boarders book store) requires you to pay to read the magazine online. I found a copy of the magazine article in which is a five page spread on Zachary Laoutides that I updated in references. Zachary Laoutides listed as the writer and actor validates the film. Also, referenced on the companies website www.avefenixpictures.com as well as IMDB. In addition I have found a radio interview and another magazine, trying to retrieve the source material or find it hosted by a third party in reference to the film.makingfilm (:)) — Preceding undated comment added 19:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC) — Makingfilm (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Struck !vote by sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ignitepictures. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a notice at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Style-ology Magazine requesting additional opinions on whether that magazine, and specifically the interview, qualify as an independent reliable source for the purpose of establishing notability. --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFF and is TOO SOON. Allow undeletion or recreation only if or when the film is released and gets independent coverage. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I respect all the opinions on here, but checking the references this film looks solid. It's just not a poster, there's tons of stills and the film looks to have had a decent budget. The others, yes, too soon. I'm checking out the production company that is a solid source and even lists musicans well noted in Mexico. The film is an American film, but Latino themed. I would redirect the other films to Ave Fenix Pictures if there is a page for them. User:mikeyiron (◕-◕) — mikeyiron (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.