Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjunctpreneur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adjunctpreneur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially an essay that relies on synthesis of given sources, none of which actually even mention the term. Not a notable neologism. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unencyclopedic. Wikipedia isn't the place for deductions or original research. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 20:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable neologism and original synthesis. I can find no reliable sources online, no hits on Scholar, and the supposed "findings of the research by Babb and Mirabella" are in fact a book called "Make Money Teaching Online: How to Land Your First Academic Job, Build Credibility, and Earn a Six-Figure Salary"... Kolbasz (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTESSAY --Jersey92 (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.