Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adobe Connect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe Connect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT Mfixerer (talk) 07:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep a very quick WP:BEFORE finds [1][2][3][4] and so on... —siroχo 07:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Those references seem to be for a another product, maybe a predecesor. 84.78.248.171 (talk) 11:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It's the same product, rebranded. You can refer to the article under consideration for deletion. —siroχo 22:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The very first hit that I get when clicking on the word "books" above is a whole book about this, which seems to be independent and reliable. How, exactly, does this fail WP:NSOFT? I think we need more than two words to understand how a seemingly notable subject is not really. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Please, make sure the whole content of the article can be referenced from that. 90.167.219.121 (talk) 13:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Notability as an attribute of subjects, not articles. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No evidence that it does not meet NSOFT. Meets the notability guidelines. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No strong argument for deletion. Many sources available especially under older names. ~Kvng (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.