Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Schrinner (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ TarnishedPath^talk 05:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Schrinner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Mayors/councillors of city councils are rarely notable for doing mayor/councillor things alone. TarnishedPath^talk 04:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, and Australia. TarnishedPath^talk 04:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article has problems, and I agree that holding a local government position does not necessarily confer notability. However, subject has been substantially covered in media, and not merely as a medium for policy. Just recently, you could point to the broad coverage regarding his position on the 2032 Olympics forum and relationship with state government, or the commentary on his substantial budget cuts. Even outside of those larger events, he is regularly covered and quoted in media. The fact that he is the mayor of a major (capital) city, and indeed heads the largest council in the country is also persuasive. gompk 04:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• (edit conflict) Keep NPOL/POLITICAN is a positive test for presumed notability, not meeting NPOL is not grounds for deletion. Subject is lord mayor of an urban conglomoration of 1 million+ people; it is the single largest local government area by population in Australia. NB WP:POLOUTCOMES: "Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD"...". That aside, the article contains a plethora of reliable sourcing that demonstrates the subject passes WP:GNG/WP:BIO. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 04:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per gompk and Goldsztajn and WP:POLOUTCOMES. Jfire (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.